Quote from Rooble :

The damage has already been done with the release of LFS-Tune and its method of holding the offsets, ciph should just spend 10 minutes knocking together a simple download/update system that can retrieve the data from online. I've already implemented my own update feature that automatically retrieves any updated offsets and such, I think letting them sit in a readable .ini file is just begging for trouble really. I'm sure a few people have clocked on already how to find more of the remaining offsets and use LFS-Tune as a compiled injection like method.

i was thinking about this an i think i gonna do it like that

im unable to laugh about such joke?

Some people here dont understand what Beta means. Type inside google define:beta to get a nice and simple definition of beta and then stop complaining about stuff not working

Im right now on a big update like Rims Editor, alot new values, and stuff that wasnt ever inside a tweak before

Some people here should learn something about engines and how they work, the starter does nothing else than just pushing the engine without ingnitation inside untill the engine is able to ingite the cylinder room after that happened the start is useless.

okay i guess time for a little story about LFS and games again...

1. LFS is a freaking game like NFS or Race The WTCC game (quickest thing in my mind) which are simply a game, you can play the game however you want since its a game? Games are meant for full fun and to do whatever they wanna inside a game if you play an FPS game then you can shoot whoever u want the result is always the same: fun.
But if you are beeing a dickhole and try to give anyone and everyone arguments about stuff inside a game he truely fails at life horrible, that guy must be friendless, had maximum 2 girl friends and looks ugly as hell.

2. NO ONE aboslutly NO ONE said ever Cars cant be realistic if they have billion HP, can you imagine cars in arround 1000 years? just look now at the cars the most powerful cars does already have arround 1000hp and if you calculate some years to the HP it wont be much a dream or unrealistic stuff since the future is coming and coming.

And to all others who like my work i want to thank for the comments.

And sorry for probably a bad gramma im in rush

Drugs for my eyes yippay!

Yes i found many new values

Wheels, Engine, Cylinders, Turbo, Turbo Max. many more..

Edit: JTBo if you dont like Tweaks then gtfo and dont post in my Thread, if you like realistic driving get a driver license and good bye

Last edited by ciph, Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:11.

I have found new values


Enjoy editing

Last edited by Bob Smith, Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:32. Reason : removed memory addresses

Quote from Blackout :

Some feedback.

The engine size doesn't work as it should I think. It doesn't actually change the engine size for what you ask. And In the XRG for example, you can only have sizes between 1000-1500cc.

Cylinder amount would also be good to have. And all the tire parameters, and well, all the stuff what was in the old tweaks actually. :P

The program actually seems to works on all cars, but it uses either the default or your previous values which make the cars ridiculous anyway, but it does. I managed to get it confused while trying what cars it could do, and it didn't recognize I changed back to a car it supported.

The XRT Engine Size is not the correct address. Somehow im unable to find the Engine size address for XRT i have found many others like Max Cylinder, Min Cylinder, Max Gears, Min Gears but they all seem useless for me im still browsing the memory when i have something new i will let you of course know here.

When i will do updates i will post them here for sure.

Im working right now on more options when i have that done i will add all cars

Finally Moderator approval!

No problem, if you need help in VB6 feel free to add me on MSN or PM me. Im mastering VB since 1995

Anyways you can also try CopyMemory. To get the Pointer use VarPtr()

Should look like this:

CopyMemory SomethingOnce, ByVal VarPtr(SomethingArray(X)), Len(SomethingArray(X))

Quote from XCNuse :

It has to go through the moderators each time.

Whats the point? Its the same just with Demo check fixed this time i gave it my friends to test it and it seems to work now. So whats the big deal here about the "Tweaks" they aint harmful + modifiying the car online will not help. Live for Speed checks both car specifications and compare them, if they dont match it will result an error. So what the hell is the big deal in this thing?

Seriously this place is wicked.

Quote from Bob Smith :

I do agree with Rob too, but there is a place for both apps. The fixed car-swap apps, usable offline and online, and the creation utility. I want to come up with a good way of allowing the creation of preset packs that will swap the three demo cars over (the way I'm doing it atm is a bit cumbersome). Also when LFSTweak lets you edit ~20 values (some of which may not have clear purposes), it is possible with a little time to get familiar with it. When you have a program that can edit well over 400 values, things get a little trickier. Quick and easy to use it ain't. Essentially, by releasing a preset version first, I set the standard expected of custom cars, so once the tools are released, most people won't bother releasing 5 minute jobs.

I could go down the route of only giving the editor to people I'd think were going to make good use of it, but frankly I don't fancy getting 300 PMs from different people and then have to come up with a way to decide. Whatever way I go ahead, I want to keep some degree of professionalism to it. I'll think of it more once the first static version is out. I'm sure it will keep people amused while we discuss the way forward here.

Maybe it is possible to get over 400 values but whats the point? By perfecting all possible values you are going to nowhere . And could you please stop playing the big hero in this forum? I dont know how you became an Moderator but i dont care to be honest, must be someones fault. Show something or keep quiet, Thanks?

Quote from Bob Smith :

This is making no sense and I'm drunk and tired too (which isn't helping).

If I have the following code:


Public Type Something
Lots of variables....
End Type

Public SomethingArray() As Something
Public SomethingOnce As Something

Public Sub SomethingElse

'populate SomethingArray here...

SomethingOnce = SomethingArray(x)

End Sub


The problem I'm having is that SomethingOnce does not match with SomethingArray(x)... I'm getting loads of data type misalignments. Which is silly, as whatever auto-padding VB6 adds should be identical, so there should be no problems copying the data. Only it doesn't work (note that in my real code, Something is a fairly complex set of some data types, other UDTs, and arrays of UDTs). What is really curious is that changing the structure of the UDTs that Something is made from (by manually adding padding bytes) affects the data misalignments. I was hoping to find the right padding which would cause the problem to go away but I've had no luck.

This problem seemed to come out of the blue, the copy worked fine until I added an extra UDT to Something, and now everything has gone to pot. I just don't understand why.

Any ideas?

maybe u tell us what variable type "Something" is in real since vb6 dont have Something? Is it String, Integer, Boolean, Long ?

If you tell me the format i can maybe help you out on the memory problem

Okay i will take another look at the demo check

Edit: When i fixed it, im allowed to release?

Last edited by ciph, Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:17.

i roll my joint and enjoy the show

Quote from Gunn :

Not according to XCNuse.

so why is no one telling me that its not working?

Quote from Gunn :

Your original version had no license check and the information I have says that as of three days ago your license checking system doesn't work. I can't confirm that though since I haven't seen an updated version from you since your original.

It does work :/

No they cant use it...

When can i release it. Im waiting for almost 4 days and still no moderator approval or any status.

Give me now a final answer. Can i release it?

Quote from hugoluis :

Missing file: COMDLG32.OCX

VB Runtime File...

Whats This?

• I have seen many threads about when LFSTweak will come for the new Patches but i have the feeling that will never happen. So i decided to make my own little Tweak or whatever you wanna name it.

Limitations

• There are almost none, i made this application work off settings. If a new Update will happen you can easily lookup yourself the new memory addresses and
  modify the settings.ini or add new cars through it (LFS existing ones!).

Suggestions / Ideas

• Im always open for Ideas and Suggestions, if you have something to say just post it. Also help is welcome too, if you are a Debugger nerd like me and you have found something useful let me know.

Installation

• You can execute the application from anywhere you want. Start LFS-Tune and Live for Speed S2 Y. After you selected the Mode you want to play you can start Editing the cars.

Howto

• This works like the old LFSTweak, you go into the Box, minimize LFS, modify the Settings, go back to LFS, enjoy!

Missing Files

• COMDLG32.OCX - http://www.afreeocx.com/ocx/download/2873/comdlg32.ocx

Beta Version

• The current new values will only work for the XRG, XFG. BF1 support is under construction.

Common Errors

• You have to unlock LFS to use this Tool
  • If you get this error make sure you have LFS set to English or German

• Invalid Live for Speed Version, Patch '0' is required.
  • Make sure you have "Settings.ini" in the same directory where LFS-Tune.exe is located.

.Net Framework 2.0 or above is required in order to run this application!



Donators:
- Quabopem (Probably the only person who appricate work)



_

Last edited by ciph, Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:50. Reason : New Update

Ok fine alot people here pissed me now off, who the hell says drifting is no Sport? Show me the OFFICAL line where it 100% says "Drifting is no Sport", and no Sport is not who crosses first the line, then football would be unfair due all the Lines. A Sport is where u can win and loose - thats Sport (Not Ahtletic). And i have something to say about those people who keep whining for better drift features, if you have a car then you have it until you are uber rich to buy a good engine and all standarts for the Drifting scene. You can drift almost with every car you drive in real life if you are good. If you can drive a car seriously good then you should know what really matters about a good Racing Simulator. Another thing: Racing doesnt automaticaly means you have to cross the line first its about Timing, Drifting is also about Timing too!

Now seriously stop whining about such shit im sick of it i read it everyday i usually dont reply to such stuff but this time you got me on a high level of madness