Probably one of Hamiltons best weekends, did the job on saturday then got the key overtakes done on sunday to insure the clean sweep.
Joakim Bonnier in 1958.
How I found it i don't know but it was a manual search through Wiki and not google.
How I found it i don't know but it was a manual search through Wiki and not google.
Last edited by Mustafur, .
Bruce Mclaren and Frank Williams, does that year mean as in any year or the one on the previous answer?
Jan Lammers is definetely the answer, this answer was very easy to find compared to the last one.
Usually when it comes to these quizes it tests everyones google ability rather then knowledge about f1 though.
Usually when it comes to these quizes it tests everyones google ability rather then knowledge about f1 though.
90s F1 backmarkers highlighted how bad a team can be if they tried their hardest to be slow, most got to the point where they could of just got a Formula 3000 car and put an f1 spec engine and they would of been seconds quicker.
It was the Dallara 3087 in 1988 which was based on a formula 3000 car, qualified 18 seconds slower then the pole time in pre-qualifying in Brazil.
Senna and Prost collided with each other in the Mclarens before i was born, Yet I know Prost turned in early and pretty much instigated that incident(allthough a different type of corner its pretty much identical to what Schumacher did to JV).
How I know this according to Blueflame must mean I use witchcraft.
How I know this according to Blueflame must mean I use witchcraft.
Last edited by Mustafur, .
To take that win away is unfair imo, regardless of what the rules state, it was no fault of the Team or Driver.
Like I said before, no brits were involved so its a non issue for him.
The selective criticizing of Schumacher is lol worthy.
Ricciardo to test for Redbull in the Silverstone test: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/108807
I already pointed it out before that Marks pit crew actually hold the Pit stop record, so its not the case.
My theory is back in those days the difference between the elite and the average drivers was much bigger, now that there is soo much more development series out there now the talent that comes through is much more refined, so the difference between all the drivers isn;t that much anymore.
Before having a 1 second gap to your team mate in qualifying was normal, now that would almost get you sacked.
Back in those days there was much more field spread, what Vettel is doing now is basically identical to what Schumi was doing back then, only he isn't in a Ferrari so you can't stand it.
Vettel isn't Dirty, he does have a ruthless attitude to winning, but it doesn't make him a bad driver, just makes him look self centred look at any elite driver back in the 80s and they where exactly the same.
Also Schumi was similar but there is no denying his ability, even in his 40s with several years off he gave Rosberg a run for his money, just because he tapped wheels with a British driver doesn't make him untalented.
in wet conditions the way cars work is completely different.
For instance before 2009 the Redbulls were really fast in weather despite being midfield in any other condition.
Time will tell but your talking as if he is the best driver on the grid without any true evidence.
Justin Wilson beat Mark Webber in the same team in F3000, when it came to being in the same team in Jaguar in 2003, Webber was having a field day.
Previous categories doesn't mean everything, look at Kobayashi for example, sucked ass in GP2 then blasted on the scene when he got into F1.
Well for starters Barrichello actually outperformed him in qualiying and in points(I would say Maldonado looked more impressive against Barrichello then Hulkenburg in his rookie year as he actually outqualified him reguarly).
One pole position doesn't change that fact.
The rest of what you said is pure speculation, and sounds like James allen talking About Hamilton when he was at ITV
Rosberg can beat Hamilton on his day and thats the point im trying to raise, most pundits would of said Hamilton would wipe the floor with Rosberg because they thought Schumacher had passed it and thought he wasn't a good comparison.
I think Hamilton is probably better overall then Rosberg still but there is no doubting Rosbergs ability to beat Hamilton on certain rounds convincingly.
Like its always been, Average driver beating a below average driver in Supreme equipment in F1 terms means they are a elite Driver(Perfect example of this would be Damon Hill).
Where as a High end Driver beating an Average driver in Sub Par equipment in F1 terms means they are Average(Button in Honda era would be good example).
But im sorry for saying something against your favorite driver forgive me.
Last edited by Mustafur, .
Sponsorship money is usually used for the season spending as it guaranteed where as the constructors money tends to be the profit they will make for the year.
Drivers championship is the media presence which in tern is good for sponsors, Constructors is still the bread and butter though.
How can we tell Hulkenburg is as good as anybody he hasn't been team mates with, i mean we know he would beat Chilton and van de garde but apart from that we don't know too much.
People want to make comparisons but when drivers like Hamilton get wacked by Rosberg anything can happen.
From what I have seen in the last two years:
Ricciardo is very good in Qualifying and in the races he is equal with Vergne from what I can see, but his problem is he is terrible in Wet conditions where Vergne is really fast in tricky weather.
People want to make comparisons but when drivers like Hamilton get wacked by Rosberg anything can happen.
From what I have seen in the last two years:
Ricciardo is very good in Qualifying and in the races he is equal with Vergne from what I can see, but his problem is he is terrible in Wet conditions where Vergne is really fast in tricky weather.
What you just said, is Exactly wrong.
The Constructors is always the most important for any team, after all thats where their paycheck comes from.
From what I can remmember most of Marks problems have been things that have hampered his race but not terminal where Vettel tends to just get terminal issues if they come.
Don't have any statistics to back this up but thats how I can remember it being like for the last couple of years.
Don't have any statistics to back this up but thats how I can remember it being like for the last couple of years.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG