Well Montoya and Raikkonen seem to have graduated from F1 to NASCAR
but seriously now
"Olympic success seems to have little correlation with later MMA success, as many medalists hardly had distinguished careers switching to MMA."
is pretty spot on. Montoya, Marcos Ambrose etc have hardly been distinguished in NASCAR
I can't wait for Raikkonen to come to NASCAR so I can say the opposite
Apparently even if he finishes second to Jimmie Johnson, I'll still be able to make fun of him.
The turbulence made it tough to follow closely in the corners. And then on the straights they just weren't close enough. Now the same thing applies in the corners, but the gap closes faster because there is less drag with DRS activated.
But it's still not incredibly easy to pass, but it makes it more likely. I don't know what more people wanted from that race, I was fairly entertained.
Dane Cameron really impressed me in LMPC... puts the car on the pole, wins the class, 9th overall, fastest time in his class... one to watch in the future.
Ford has worked incredibly hard to establish the F150 name (and the rest of the F series) as the best truck that money can buy. Any small bit of confusion with a Ferrari is the completely wrong image. Plus Ford is American, which is a fairly big deal among their target market. I would not want my truck to in any way be perceived as Italian.
And that image is worth an incredibly large sum of money to Ford, both now and in the future.
I wouldn't want image to in any way be damaged by a racing car. Who knows what will happen during the upcoming season in the eternal circus that F1 has become?
Also, Ferrari are a bunch of ****.
In the case of the Volvo C30, I don't think the portrayed images of the two cars are as wildly opposing. And C30 isn't an iconic name like F150 is. And the logos probably aren't the exact same. But Volvo would likely have a legal case on some level.
Ferrari could have at least made the effort to choose a different font when they designed the original logo. That was bad. And I wouldn't want my trucks confused with Ferrari, though someone would have to be incredibly dumb to do so.
Yes, that thing won't flap around. It may flex a tiny amount in cornering, but this is not necessarily bad, and it will not "flap around"
Then you should have said "has a higher top speed". faster on a racing circuit generally means lap times. He is talking about lift over the roof, because the air has to travel longer over the top of the car, which causes lift. That's the general principle airplane wings work on.
WTF Thrust SSC is a landspeed car. it doesn't need downforce like that, nor does it need a low center of gravity for cornering... it does however need the lowest possible drag coefficient possible for top speed.
also, only Renault knows how much fuel was in the cars during their sessions. As well as any number of other things they might have changed on the car.
I mean if both of them can use it on the main straight, so the pass isn't "artificial"... the car in front would be using the wing too. So passing would come down to the driver's skill and ability to use the wing flap as soon as possible to gain the max speed down the straight. There would be more variety of speeds down the main straight, since drivers would use the wing differently at slightly different speeds, thus passes would be more frequent but by no means artificial. And using the wing differently in the technical bits of the track could make some very exciting passes and different lines through corners.
or is my reasoning faulty?
problem I can see is it would be terribly tiring to work the wing the entire race as well as everything else that needs to happen.
one of the drivers spun and stalled if I remember right.
Dempsey isn't Paul Newman as of yet, but his team is getting pretty respectable. If you had told me that an actor from Grey's Anatomy could finish third in the 24 hours of Daytona, I'd have taken that bet... and lost. Good on him for putting in all the effort required to get to this point despite another career.