Pole: Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull-Renault, 1:34.870
Winner: Sebastian Vettel
Second: Jenson Button
Third: Nick Heidfeld
Fastest Lap: Mark Webber, Red Bull-Renault, 1:40.571
Winning Drivers
2011: Sebastian Vettel
2010: Sebastian Vettel
2009: Jenson Button
2008: Kimi Raikkonen
2007: Fernando Alonso
Forecasted Weather (as at Tuesday 20 March)
Friday: 24-32C, chance of thunderstorms, 20% chance of rain
Saturday: 25-33C, chance of thunderstorms, 40% chance of rain
Sunday: 24-32C, chance of thunderstorms, 60% chance of rain
While Kony is a very nasty fellow (I've known about the LRA/Ugandan conflict from many years ago), those who are supporting or want to support, the KONY2012 campaign need to remember:
1. Kony's LRA is no longer active in Uganda, and has not been since 2006.
2. The Ugandan government also carries out murders, abductions, mass rapes, and similar atrocities as the LRA.
Social media is great... until millions of people become misled by a Sesame Street version of an extremely complex civil conflict.
How on Earth is Petrov more experienced than Heikki? Heikki started racing in F1 in 2007, with 2 years of testing experience before that. Petrov started in 2010.
We already have a pretty good measure of Heikki anyway. He got trashed by Hamilton at McLaren, but he proved himself by beating Fisichella in his debut season. We know that Fisichella was a stronger driver than Sato (2002) and Massa (2004), but that he was soundly beaten by Alonso (2005-2006). We also know that the then-inexperienced Massa eventually developed into a driver who was able to chase Schumacher more closely than Fisichella was able to chase Alonso in 2006. I'd hazard a semi-educated guess that Heikki is similar to Barrichello, Webber, or Heidfeld at their respective peaks: so probably 4-star driver in a scale of 5.
If that analysis is reasonably accurate, then Petrov could establish himself as a probable star if he can consistently beat Heikki. If he can't manage to do that, then he'll forever be relegated to journeyman status.
I think McLaren will still have the prettiest car, or at least the prettiest nose.
The second test should be much more interesting than the first. Reliability issues should be mostly ironed out, Mercedes will debut their 2012 contender, and the teams will be able to apply lessons learned during the first test to improve their cars and driving styles.
General rumour-mongering indicates that Red Bull and McLaren have the best-behaved cars, while Ferrari suffers from too much understeer, and Lotus is generally solid albeit with poor stability under braking.
Nice to see David Brabham and the Honda/Acura in LMP1! I guess they couldn't pass up the chance to go toe-to-toe with the Toyotas.
Strange choice of lead driver for Toyota's #2 car. Ishiura isn't really a shining driver. I would have expected someone like Kohei Hirate, who has had success in open-wheel racing in both Europe and Japan.
It's highly unlikely that Toyota will win, even with a veteran line-up. It took Peugeot three seasons to beat Audi. With a petrol engine and untested hybrid system, Toyota could take longer. They might as well give one of their most successful junior programme graduates a chance.
Their relative finishing positions don't agree with you, BlueFlame.
I just did a quick five minute graphing job, comparing the finishing positions of the two drivers relative to the median between them. Disqualifications and retirements have been excluded, as they provide no basis for comparison. Both drivers had the same number of race retirements (three). Positive result means the driver finished in the better position (eg. in China, Kobayashi placed 3.5 positions better than the median, which means Perez finished 7 positions behind).
Autosport asked team principals to vote for the drivers who they think had done the best job in the 2011 season.
AUTOSPORT TEAM PRINCIPALS' TOP TEN - 2011 RESULTS
1. Vettel 241 UP 1 2. Button 200 UP 4 3. Alonso 188 DOWN 2 4. Hamilton 122 DOWN 1 5. Rosberg 90 UP 2 6. Webber 70 DOWN 2 7. Di Resta 44 NEW ENTRY 8. Sutil 38 RE-ENTRY FROM 2009 9. Kovalainen 26 RE-ENTRY FROM 2008 10. Schumacher 23 NEW ENTRY
I think it's a pretty good list. Do you agree with them?
He was terrible in 2008 and deserved to be dropped. After two full seasons racing in mid-tier and upper-tier formulae, and he fell flat on his face in 2008. 12th in WSBR is not impressive. 15th in Euroseries, even considering it was only a part-season campaign, was poor when you look at how inconsistent he was. Second in F2 and GP3 doesn't make him look too flash either - with his level of experience, he should have won at least one of them. As for his WSBR title this year, he barely managed to beat JEV, who had only fraction of Wickens' experience.
I think he's a solid driver, but never showed the kind of dominance that JEV (Brit F3: 13/30 wins), Ricciardo (Brit F3: 7/20 wins), or Vettel (FBMW Ger: 18/20 wins) has shown, despite his ample funds.
They won't be dropping Vettel for a good few years, but I reckon Webber will be gone at the end of next season if he continues to under-perform. Helmut Marko seems to be expecting one of the two new STR drivers to be able to step up and take Webber's place eventually. As much as I hate to lose faith in Webber (having been a mild fan since his Jaguar days), he blew his last chance at the title in 2010, and is probably in decline.
Vettel is Red Bull's golden boy right now, but I bet if any other young gun proves himself faster, Vettel will quickly find himself where Webber's sitting. Better be wary.