So what is your definition of not screwing up, he got the peace prize !, and thats it for achievements. And most people feel that was a total joke.
What has he achieved for the American public, other than still being more use to his controllers alive than dead ?
Every single election promise has been ignored, US citizens are now able to murdered on some vague accusation from one of your many shadow agencies, your constitution is now a historical joke, it sure doesn't apply now.
If I lived in the US then I certainly couldn't say what I say here as now any form of dissent is illegal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v ... text=G2fa6829FUAAAAAAAGAA
And now, your military just told congress to get shafted, they no longer take orders from them !
By usual standards thats treason, but does the US Public care, hell no, they think "Thats dandy, where are the corndogs, and wallmart have a sale !"
And whats your Prez's responce, down trou and bend for Israel.
Your unable to have any form of election without massive electoral fraud and vote rigging. Even Ron Paul's had enough.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v ... dRM8&feature=youtu.be
So, clearly Barry is a shoe in for re-election, provided the controllers want him.
You've got a ponzi scheme running that owing to the 'too big to fail' attitude no one will ever face court charges over. And yet still people in the US sleepwalk their way though life, clearly it's pointless expecting any action to reclaim the concept of a democratic country.
It's interesting to read the reaction of many of you in the US regarding what your countries become, you can see but .........
And theres always a "but", unless people in the US take some action then it's going to get really messy there. But all empires fall so theres nothing different with that. It's just interesting watching an empire disintergrate while the residents watch X Factor and Evangelical TV.
And then theres your media ..........
In an attempt to give a constitutional gloss to this assertion of police-state powers, Holder made the astonishing assertion that “due process and judicial process are not one and the same… The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process.”
The speech was in response to pressure on the administration to provide a legal rationale for the targeted killing of three US citizens in Yemen last fall. Anwar al-Alawki, an alleged Al Qaeda leader, was killed in a drone attack along with another US citizen, Samir Khan. Two weeks later, Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman Alawki, was killed in a separate drone attack.
One would think that such a sweeping and extraordinary speech, asserting the right of the US government to summarily kill its own citizens, would become the focus of political discussion and the topic of heated debate. In fact, the media and the political establishment virtually ignored it. None of the three network news programs mentioned it. Articles in the major newspapers reporting the speech were relegated to the inside pages.
Last Tuesday, the day after Holder’s speech, Obama held his first White House news conference of the year. Not a single reporter asked Obama about the speech or raised the issue of presidential assassinations.
It is a measure of how far the decay of American democracy has progressed that some four decades ago the House Judiciary Committee voted to impeach Richard Nixon for “abuse of power” and “violating the constitutional rights of citizens” by ordering punitive tax audits and illegal wiretaps. Today, when the arrogation of dictatorial powers has reached the point of ordering the extra-judicial murder of citizens, there are not only no calls for impeachment, the issue is not even the subject of debate.
It took the
New York Times six days to comment on the attorney general’s speech. What it produced in an editorial published Sunday is a statement raising objections of a minor and procedural character while endorsing Holder’s basic argument and evading any consideration of its immense and ominous constitutional implications.
“A president has a right to order lethal force against conventional enemies during conventional war,” the
Times declares, “or against
unconventional enemies in
unconventional wars.” [Emphasis added]. This is a blanket endorsement of the “war on terror” and the US government’s proclaimed right under that pretext to murder those who run afoul of American imperialist interests.
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29699
Admittedly though, cutting funding is quite hard when half the Legislature is sucking up to their party friend, the President.
(October I will be though)
.