It is pretty much the same here. Threads that are just questioning the whole way of LFS being made filled with "why is there no more tracks", "why isn't LFS progressing", "LFS sucks..." etc. will get locked because there is no actual content in those threads. At RSC kunos is getting much more shit than Scawen is getting here. If you say at RSC that kunos is lazy most people would "agree". If you say Scawen is lazy you get shot. But in both cases the thread gets locked because there is no actual content. Why let useless moaning threads live? I'm not saying that kunos is doing perfect job with nk pro but calling him lazy and constantly making threads about "nk pro sucks" isn't really an appropriate way of dealing with it.
I think it is the same with copyrights inside and outside LFS. People here have no problem using stuff from rf, GTR etc. without mentioning where the stuff came from, but if some people (at RSC for example) do the same with LFS: it is a horrible crime, how dare they!
It is not what you see, it's what you want to see