Nah,
three straitghs with two very different chicanes in it. After the forest part very nice cornering section where you have to drive your high speed-setup at low speeds. In formula-cars it is, eh was, very nice and challancing.
Hockenheim was a rather long track, everything is in it. Everyone loved it, but sponsors complained about it took so long after finish to get the drivers back, not enough possibilitys of advertisements etc. And ecclestone, the man who has dollars-signs really in his eyes, only cares about money. So fia demanded an shorter track.
I prefer the new version as does the majority of F1 drivers according to Brundle. The old one was boring and dangerous - if those words can be used in the same sentence
But on this thread, I'll suggest Eastern Creek, Australia. http://www.eastern-creek-raceway.com/circuit.htm
It has a 3.93km full racing circuit, two shorter configurations, a skid-pan, and a short drifting circuit.
Brundle?? That failed F1 driver? one persons opinion. He has the right to have one. But i rather here the opionion of your self, not telling somebody else thinks it was boring.
Rather strange to call it boring, high speed part, and slow stadium section where the drivers sometimes could hear the public screaming. The stadium part they had to get through with only very little downforce.
In the days of grand prix one and two, hockenheim was a very populair track in the game/simulation and also very populair with the tv-viewers of F1 irl. But Ecclestone wanted more money money His left eye has $$$ in it and his right eye has €€€ in it.