It's really interesting how the 'general opinion' pejoratively sees atheists as the annoying people who try to convince others that they're right. From what I see and hear, it's rather people with religious beliefs that feel attacked by atheists, and try to defend their beliefs, often rather angrily.
If there's someone they should feel attacked by, it's other religions before atheists. Atheists just tell them: I don't believe in a god and I think you're wrong. People with different religious beliefs than them will say: I believe in X god(s) and you'll go in hell for not believing in that/those god(s) too.
I really find it kind of amusing that each religion predicts doom for non-believers while there's so many religions on earth. If you assume that the religion X is right and that it predicts doom to non-believers, there's probably a couple billion people to go to hell anyway.
Anyway, I'm an atheist, and I don't want to piss off people with religious beliefs: I've done it in the past and it usually brings no good. However, I do find it hard to have a constructive talk about religion between people with and without religious beliefs. I mean, is it possible to actually talk about it without trying to convince the other that he or she might be wrong? Besides, when they're trying to convince the other, it's always the same thing. One will say the bible is right, the other will say there's a lack of proof.
I don't like the idea of believing in something without having some kind of tangible proof of it. Say, if everything science says was an old textbook with no evidence, I would probably not believe any of it. However, as science is stuff I can see for myself (at least in part), I find it easy to understand.
I would say: "Well, if God wants me to believe, why doesn't he just come down to me to prove me that he exists?". And they would inevitably reply: "God can't prove it to you, you have to believe". I just don't like this unconditional "you believe or you go to hell" thing. It just doesn't seem as something a 'creator' would do. Or someone that loves you. For instance, mr. Smith has never seen his mother. At 40 years old, a woman comes to him and say: "I'm your mother, believe that or go to hell". But she has no way to prove it to mr. Smith. All he has to do is believe or not believe; how will he decide? It's not rational to do so.
I just say: maybe there's a god a maybe there isn't. I don't know.
If there's someone they should feel attacked by, it's other religions before atheists. Atheists just tell them: I don't believe in a god and I think you're wrong. People with different religious beliefs than them will say: I believe in X god(s) and you'll go in hell for not believing in that/those god(s) too.
I really find it kind of amusing that each religion predicts doom for non-believers while there's so many religions on earth. If you assume that the religion X is right and that it predicts doom to non-believers, there's probably a couple billion people to go to hell anyway.
Anyway, I'm an atheist, and I don't want to piss off people with religious beliefs: I've done it in the past and it usually brings no good. However, I do find it hard to have a constructive talk about religion between people with and without religious beliefs. I mean, is it possible to actually talk about it without trying to convince the other that he or she might be wrong? Besides, when they're trying to convince the other, it's always the same thing. One will say the bible is right, the other will say there's a lack of proof.
I don't like the idea of believing in something without having some kind of tangible proof of it. Say, if everything science says was an old textbook with no evidence, I would probably not believe any of it. However, as science is stuff I can see for myself (at least in part), I find it easy to understand.
I would say: "Well, if God wants me to believe, why doesn't he just come down to me to prove me that he exists?". And they would inevitably reply: "God can't prove it to you, you have to believe". I just don't like this unconditional "you believe or you go to hell" thing. It just doesn't seem as something a 'creator' would do. Or someone that loves you. For instance, mr. Smith has never seen his mother. At 40 years old, a woman comes to him and say: "I'm your mother, believe that or go to hell". But she has no way to prove it to mr. Smith. All he has to do is believe or not believe; how will he decide? It's not rational to do so.
I just say: maybe there's a god a maybe there isn't. I don't know.