Quote from Ped7g :

dasilva94: as it is actively being developed, you can't consider it abandonware. And source must be opened by author, which goes back to the first thing, about being actively developed. I.e. "not now" (if ever). (unless Scawen decides to go open source route right now, and selling basically just content packs, with less control about the future way of development)

In fairness, does over 18 months without a single change constitute 'active development'? Remember the VW Sirocco? Never released and at this stage, the car has ceased production!

Scawen could at least release some Youtube videos documenting the development progress. But really we are in limbo with LFS, while the iRacings and the rFactors forge kilometres ahead

Would be more accurate to consider LFS abandonware at this stage?
And open up the source code, like what happened with Falcon 4.0.
The community development of the latter has been brilliant!

Last edited by dasilva94, Fri, 2 Mar 2018 07:46.