Thx for the links, I only tried "th2go" in the search function, so I didn't see the subject was already existing.
In fact, for a grip race, it's not a big issue for me, but if want to look by the door when I am in a drifting session it s unusable because of the zoom effect.
In fact, for a grip race, it's not a big issue for me, but if want to look by the door when I am in a drifting session it s unusable because of the zoom effect.
Last edited by jempe, .
thx for the answer, I know I can change the FOV, but if you select a too small fov, you lost the benefit of surround view....
A good fov is minimum 120° (60 per screen). If you think about the position of the screens that make a angle between them, you can calculate a more important fov to expect a correct field of view.
A good fov is minimum 120° (60 per screen). If you think about the position of the screens that make a angle between them, you can calculate a more important fov to expect a correct field of view.
Avoiding Fisheye with TH2GO
TH2Go works very well on LFS. (LFS technicaly rules )
But it still have a issue: the fish eye effect that makes a zoom effect on side screens.
So is there a solution to avoid this?
Maybe, I should post an "feature suggestion" post?
Some games like rfactor or il2 have a triple video-projector support but no th2go support. I think it's crazy because how many people use a triple vp solution???
By triple vp support, I mean that your screens must have 90° between them.
An example:
http://img359.imageshack.us/my.php?image=grab089tr1.jpg
This feature should be really great if we could change the number of degrees between screens
)But it still have a issue: the fish eye effect that makes a zoom effect on side screens.
So is there a solution to avoid this?
Maybe, I should post an "feature suggestion" post?
Some games like rfactor or il2 have a triple video-projector support but no th2go support. I think it's crazy because how many people use a triple vp solution???
By triple vp support, I mean that your screens must have 90° between them.
An example:
http://img359.imageshack.us/my.php?image=grab089tr1.jpg
This feature should be really great if we could change the number of degrees between screens
Last edited by jempe, .
Another member!!
I am glad about removed autocut/blip as a clutch user, but maybe it would make ALL the people happy if it was a server optional realism option?!
I am glad about removed autocut/blip as a clutch user, but maybe it would make ALL the people happy if it was a server optional realism option?!
If you have enough money to buy a computer, you have enough money to buy a low priced game... that's all.
Last edited by jempe, .
It's depend on the 911 version, porsche made many of them 
.... vx and vxr are similar in grip performance but vxr is equiped with better tires and wheels... Ne juge pas quand tu ne connais pas.
And about my cars physics comparison, someone can suggest something to compare XRT and XRG, Maybe BMW e30 for the weight and behaviour? I speak about this old car because 1100-1200 kg is light for a recent car.
And about my cars physics comparison, someone can suggest something to compare XRT and XRG, Maybe BMW e30 for the weight and behaviour? I speak about this old car because 1100-1200 kg is light for a recent car.
Last edited by jempe, .
PFfffrt, okay... a porsche 911 if you prefer... porsche watches and porsche hard drives exist too, but they are not similar to the fz5...
Last edited by jempe, .
Well... I am not english. I thought you english spokers know the impreza as a scooby... In fact, in my country, the word scooby don't exist for this car...
I am confuse, I forgot that celica exist in a four whell drive version.
And last, I don't own a impreza, I only owned an opel speedster... Hmmm "mister I know the cars", maybe you know it as the vauxhall vx220 ... because you played it in Gran Tourismo 4. I also own a BMW 325 e30 for drifting trackday. And that s all about my own little story.
When I speak about physic based on, I should ask: which cars are the most equal in physics.
For example when I say FZ5 is definitvly a porsche it's because of: rear whell drive, power, engin type and "engine behind rear wheels"
I am confuse, I forgot that celica exist in a four whell drive version.
And last, I don't own a impreza, I only owned an opel speedster... Hmmm "mister I know the cars", maybe you know it as the vauxhall vx220 ... because you played it in Gran Tourismo 4
. I also own a BMW 325 e30 for drifting trackday. And that s all about my own little story.When I speak about physic based on, I should ask: which cars are the most equal in physics.
For example when I say FZ5 is definitvly a porsche it's because of: rear whell drive, power, engin type and "engine behind rear wheels"
Last edited by jempe, .
On what cars are the LFS PHYSICS based on?
http://en.lfsmanual.net/wiki/F ... _the_LFS_cars_based_on.3F
I've just read this section. It's good for car looking, but I think the more important are the physics!!
For example,
-RB4 is more a scooby than a celica if we consider physics
-FZ5: the engine position suit only for a porsche but not for the ferrari 550 nor 612.
What do you think about it?
I've just read this section. It's good for car looking, but I think the more important are the physics!!
For example,
-RB4 is more a scooby than a celica if we consider physics
-FZ5: the engine position suit only for a porsche but not for the ferrari 550 nor 612.
What do you think about it?
CSR and sound packs are Great job!! thx for that!
Just a question: IS it possible to add skids sounds in CSR?
Just a question: IS it possible to add skids sounds in CSR?
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG