I don't want to get into a situation where drivers' notes are for public consumption. I can't imagine anything worse than someone using CTRA notes as leverage in an argument against a driver's character.
I'm working on the web-based reporting function at the moment. While I understand that people want to know that "something's done about this terrible driver", I'm really cautious about relaying the action taken. 'Open | In process | Actioned' should be adequate. The mission is to ensure good driving on the servers over all, and anything more than a 3-stage report summary tends towards the witch hunt we're looking to avoid.
I'm not saying no, I'm just saying that there's got to be a REALLY good reason to give more info than that. We already frequently receive whinges from drivers being penalised without opening the floodgates to complaints from reporters that the penalty issued wasn't harsh enough.
e: Or TOO harsh, as happened once.
I'm working on the web-based reporting function at the moment. While I understand that people want to know that "something's done about this terrible driver", I'm really cautious about relaying the action taken. 'Open | In process | Actioned' should be adequate. The mission is to ensure good driving on the servers over all, and anything more than a 3-stage report summary tends towards the witch hunt we're looking to avoid.
I'm not saying no, I'm just saying that there's got to be a REALLY good reason to give more info than that. We already frequently receive whinges from drivers being penalised without opening the floodgates to complaints from reporters that the penalty issued wasn't harsh enough.
e: Or TOO harsh, as happened once.