The online racing simulator
Windows Vista Ultimate
(58 posts, started )
For DOS games (I can't be bothered to use DOSbox )

It doesn't need 2 gigs of ram I have 448mb of ram and it works fine.
I like my ATi Radeon X800 PRO VIVO
Quote from Racer X NZ :Hard to think of a better way to run 98.

If Vista didn't need 2 gig of ram & a good video card just to run itself then I might like it more.
Still, XP is supported till 2010 so I'll think about changing then........

And if OSX is crashing then check the permissions and apple/option/P/R on startup. The magic number is 5 chimes.

I run Vista on an Athlon XP 2500, 1 gig RAM and a 9600XT and i have no problems with it
Not saying it won't run, It just runs 4X slower than XP on the same spec machine
Probably does. Only on vista because i found a remote for media center at home
#30 - Jakg
Vista with one GB of RAM was painful. Less than 500 MB of RAM?

:X
Vista is really painfull, all spangly bits, and slow performance.
Jack, mine only started to run decently with 2 GB, any less and it was like jabbing your eyes out with the blunt end of a dull stick.
Quote from shaun463 :For DOS games (I can't be bothered to use DOSbox )

It doesn't need 2 gigs of ram I have 448mb of ram and it works fine.
I like my ATi Radeon X800 PRO VIVO

ehh! how is it possible? one of my friend is using vista too, but his vista sucks 750mb of ram without running any application!
#34 - Jakg
Depends on what you have - If you have 1 GB of RAM Vista will use 500 MB of RAM, 2 GB it'll use 1 GB etc.

iirc Vista uses about 300-400 MB of RAM, and the rest is Vista's "SuperFetch" caching stuff in RAM to make it load faster.
Bollocks to it.

Gone back to nLite'd XP SP3. Much better.
#36 - Jakg
I must say that while i'm not exactly sold either way on XP vs Vista, nLite is a MUCH better tool than vLite.
Bah, it took me 2 GB of RAM to enjoy Vista, I'd love to go back to XP, but I'm too lazy to format
It seems i'm one of the very few with a good experience with Vista.
Runs equal to or faster than my XP ever did, not experienced any bugs or anything, i'm actually really happy with it (Also loving running Crysis in DX10, drool).
Also, while using desktop app's, i've never seen my RAM usage go above 900mb (~400mb after boot has finished) out of the 2gb i have. So what if XP wouldn't have used that much, i still have 1.1gb headroom left.

I'm not trying to say that you Vista haters are incorrect in your opinions, it's just a shame everyone hasn't had the same experience with it that i have had.
I only started liking it really after the RAM upgrade I put in. But I find that it pretty much uses 50% no matter what. With 1 GB I had about 50% usage, same with 2 GB RAM, but that's with a 145MB firefox using up RAM.

Crysis ran decently for me on low settings, but that's just my iMac is sucky, and Halo 2.. A lovely 1.1 GB of RAM used
#40 - Jakg
Quote from GFresh :(Also loving running Crysis in DX10, drool)

Use the config hacks and you get Visuals identical to DX10 in DX9 mode with extra performance.

IMO i don't think Crysis even IS DX10, or at least it doesn't use any (noticeable) features of the new API (and yes i know DX10's main aim was more performance - ironic really!)
I think the water is the only DX10 BS
#42 - Woz
I still dont understand why something that lets you run apps, access a file system and run a GUI requires 2Gb of ram. Come on!!!!!

Even MS agree its a bloated OS and their focus on Win7 is small. Says it all. For me Vista is a miss and I will wait for Win 7 to decide if MS has learnt its lesson and produce a computer OS that good for hardware.

At least the growing popularity in things like the EEE means it will force MS back to what actually matters

My next reformat and I dual boot WinXP and Ubuntu.
When I installed XP on this computer (it was a SP1 disc), it ran so painfully slow that I couldn't update it to SP2 or SP3. Installed Vista, and the only problems I have had were crashes while experimenting with overclocks on both my graphics card and CPU.
It's not the slowness that annoys me as such (although there is a noticeable framerate drop in LFS and other games), it's the entire bloated layout of the OS.

If I have a bunch of documents in a folder, and then a media file, the last thing I need is for the OS to 'recognise' the folder as a media folder and give me something stupid like a thumbnail view or whatever. When I say apply my details layout to every folder, I mean it. I don't mean apply it some, then piss about with others. I just don't have time to waste messing about with a useless layout.

I used it for about a year, then just gave up. Of course I realise we all have to learn new operating systems given time, but learning the upgrade from OS X Tiger to Leopard took all of about 5 minutes, and every new thing I found was actually useful. Similarly every time I upgrade Linux things just get easier. I still wouldn't recommend it to the average user (don't know about these 'user-friendly' distros like Ubuntu, didn't like it myself). However if you need a job doing, get the right tool for it first.

As a multi-OS 'power' user I now rarely use Windows for anything other than games, thus my streamlined XP does the job perfectly for me.
Had to give this a little bump when I saw this:
#46 - Jakg
The irony in that pic is the fact it's running XP...
Quote from Jakg :The irony in that pic is the fact it's running XP...

Aaahh...but it *MIGHT* be running Vista with an XP theme!!!

Anyways, reason for the bump is that 2 hours ago I installed Vista SP1, and the difference is phenomenal! I can actually copy files across my network now without having to book 2 weeks off work!
A few other improvements too...noticed a 7 - 12% increase in framerates across the board in all the games I've tested so far, and unpacking RAR/ZIP files is up to 30% faster too!
Starting to like Vista now

In case anybody is wondering, the version I have installed is the RTM Build 6001.18000; NOT the old 17xxx RC2 that has been floating around
Installation took about 30 mins or so, and went smooth as a baby's bum
I'll prolly give it a go again once the service pack is out...
#49 - wien
Quote from Bladerunner :Anyways, reason for the bump is that 2 hours ago I installed Vista SP1, and the difference is phenomenal!

Sounds good. I'm currently downloading it via Bittorrent (why couldn't they just release it on WU? It's already gone out for manufacturing...) and most of what you mentioned is what currently annoys me about Vista. A few more driver revisions from ATI and it might actually become somewhat decent.

The only thing missing now is an option for changing that damn baby-blue toolbar/menu colour in Aero. Why on earth would they hard-code something like that?
Quote from wien :The only thing missing now is an option for changing that damn baby-blue toolbar/menu colour in Aero. Why on earth would they hard-code something like that?

It's not hardcoded, you can change it...

Right click desktop > Personalize > Window Colour and Appearance > Open classic appearance properties > Advanced > Selected Items > Colour 1

Windows Vista Ultimate
(58 posts, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG