Nuclear would be great, as long as there is not another Chernobyl.

There can't be - the fail safes against that type of problem cannot happen again.

Quote from Ca18Slider :

Nuclear would be great, as long as there is not another Chernobyl.

Learn your history... (I know, its wikipedia but its probably fairly accurate for this)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster

Quote from wheel4hummer :

Learn your history... (I know, its wikipedia but its probably fairly accurate for this)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster

Wheel4Hummer, I'm well aware of what Chernobyl was - but that sort of accident should never happen again, at all. It was a disaster, there needs to be no history brushup to know that. Imagine if all scientists wanted to test something, in a large nuclear facility, that's highly dangerous? I wouldn't settle for that. I'm just wondering where you get the idea that I need a history brushup?

Quote from Ca18Slider :

Imagine if all scientists wanted to test something, in a large nuclear facility, that's highly dangerous?

Well I certainly doubt that they would conduct a highly dangerous experiment at a large nuclear facility that is near a populated area. Also, nowadays we can perform complex calculations and run computer simulations before testing something. I mean, the large governments of the world have the resources to create an underground nuclear facility that is far away from any populated area to devote solely to testing.