The online racing simulator
Youtube policing has gone too far >;o
2
(49 posts, started )
Yeh Im only 14
Well I got one of those with only 1,500 views on a video, so I'm guessing you're right and it's either an automated system or someone paid to search the videos.
Quote from TAYLOR-MANIA :I can't remember remember the exact details now but i had a message some time ago, saying the music used is copyrighted to some music label and they'll place adverts on the page. Fair enough.

What i wondered though is how they come across a random video like that using their music? Do they have some kind of automated system that matches the audio spikes or something? Or is there actually someone paid to watch YouTube videos?

Basically, yeh they sample references, they do the same with video, for example if you uploaded a music video of a band, if it was ripped from the official video on another page, it would match it and banhammer!
Quote from AMB :Child porn she's 16?

and he isn't doing any harm since he's young, if he was an old man than it would be something to worry about.

Under 18 mate. Counted as child porn.

It doesn't matter how young you are, you're still viewing it and you can still be charged.

If you don't get charged, your parents will.
Youtube removes videos only when someone (copyright owner) reports the video. That explains why video B is still there while video A was removed, regardless of when the videos were uploaded and how popular they were.

This is because of DMCA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D ... _Millennium_Copyright_Act

It means when some e.g. record company asks them to remove some video(s)/material(s), Youtube has to do it or they're going to get lawsuit. DMCA is basically only reason why Youtube still exists because obviously large portion of the videos are copyrighted.

There also interesting aspect to this, which I realised not so long ago... Youtube (or Google) is basically making money with illegal videos (ads). As far as I know 4 video removals are allowed, from fifth the whole account gets deleted.

On the upload page it pretty clearly says copyrighted videos should not be uploaded (but of course no cares, neither do I), so its not like Youtube has insulted your human rights.

-
Quote from TAYLOR-MANIA :I can't remember remember the exact details now but i had a message some time ago, saying the music used is copyrighted to some music label and they'll place adverts on the page. Fair enough.

What i wondered though is how they come across a random video like that using their music? Do they have some kind of automated system that matches the audio spikes or something? Or is there actually someone paid to watch YouTube videos?

There is some kind of video matchig system. I don't know how it works. Someone is probably also browsing it 24/7.

The ad system you and ATC Quicksilver mentioned is also part of this video matching system, which was introduced since the beginning of 2008.

It basically helps videos to stay on youtube.

You can also see the "matched" videos from your account settings:



Some companies have this policy, some companies have zero tolerance (e.g. F1 commercial rights holder Formula One Management).
#32 - AMB
Quote from Klutch :Under 18 mate. Counted as child porn.

It doesn't matter how young you are, you're still viewing it and you can still be charged.

If you don't get charged, your parents will.

Ah I see, well I didn't know that


, well it happens all over the world, mates sending links to others including things like this, but least i know now......
Quote from Jordan2007 :BTW I Just noticed, i hardly see anyone on LFS That i know on the forum!

Most regular forum-goers aren't regular LFS-goers.
Apart from me, nearly 20 hours on LFS in the last 7 days
#35 - Jakg
Quote from Klutch :Under 18 mate. Counted as child porn.

It doesn't matter how young you are, you're still viewing it and you can still be charged.

If you don't get charged, your parents will.

Under Age-Of-Consent = Child Porn (i.e. UNDER 16 in the UK). A 16 year old still isn't allowed to make porn though - they have to be 18 (WTF).
Quote from Jakg :Under Age-Of-Consent = Child Porn (i.e. UNDER 16 in the UK). A 16 year old still isn't allowed to make porn though - they have to be 18 (WTF).

Anything under 18 is counted as child porn.
You're still a kid, until you reach 18, in which case you become an adult
#37 - Jakg
You sure?

If a girl is 17 - a video of her is child porn? even if the act of sex is perfectly legal (age of consent is 16 here)?

That makes no sense. At all.
5 of my video's got deleted.
3 last week.

Me haz video's with really much views
Aantal keren bekeken: 384115
Aantal keren bekeken: 110430
Aantal keren bekeken: 104256
Aantal keren bekeken: 57187
Aantal keren bekeken: 39549
Aantal keren bekeken: 33909
Aantal keren bekeken: 27643
Aantal keren bekeken: 21259
Aantal keren bekeken: 18005

I can continue but i wont


www.youtube.com/cholover
Quote from Jakg :

If a girl is 17 - a video of her is child porn? even if the act of sex is perfectly legal (age of consent is 16 here)?

as far as I'm aware the term 'child porn' is used only when a child under the age of consent is actually involved in some sexual act with another person. Images and stuff like that video are counted as indecent images of children, not child pornography
#40 - AMB
I guess I was right then muhaha for a change, and anyway if a girl is on your bed of the same age, let's say doing 'stuff' and you record it does it count as child porn?
Quote :Protection of Children Act 1978
1978 CHAPTER 37

An Act to prevent the exploitation of children by making indecent photographs of them; and to penalise the distribution, showing and advertisement of such indecent photographs.

[20th July 1978]

[...]

7 Interpretation
[...]
(2)References to an indecent photograph include an indecent film, a copy of an indecent photograph or film, and an indecent photograph comprised in a film.

[...]

(5)“Film” includes any form of video-recording.

(6)“Child”, subject to subsection (8), means a person under the age of 16.

[...]

(8)If the impression conveyed by a pseudo-photograph is that the person shown is a child, the pseudo-photograph shall be treated for all purposes of this Act as showing a child

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Revised ... 1978/cukpga_19780037_en_1

**** sake im not a paedophile Lol im 14!!!!!
#43 - 5haz
Lol said girl is older than him.

How did this go so OT?

Isn't it fairly obvious, Child = Under 18, Porn = Ask your Mother what that means.
Can we end the child porn chat LOL? There probobly alot of page visits from people who don't even play LFS for alllllllllllllllllll the wrong reasons.
If you are like 15 and you happen to be watching under-age porn, I don't think any serious harm with come to you.

That said, in the UK, the age is 16 and so therefore underage (child) porn is under the age of 16. If you're under this age, if you are watching it, you'd probbably just get a slap on the wrist, however if you were tapping it, you could be done for statutory rape, even if it was consensuel.

In the US, it's 18. So it applies slightly differently.

Either way, if you're a 55 year old man with 25gigs of the stuff, you're gunna get done, if you're a horny teenager wanting to rub one off, I doubt you'd get in trouble.
What has this forum come to?
sooo, back on topic!

UMG folks have taken 2 of my vids, this one; with ads on it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOV748-kBc8

and i got this mail the other day
Quote :Dear jvgoderstad,
Video Disabled
A copyright owner has claimed it owns some or all of the audio content in your video Tanabe Stunts. The audio content identified in your video is The Barracuda by The 5,6,7,8's. We regret to inform you that your video has been blocked from playback due to a music rights issue.
Replace Your Audio with AudioSwap
Don't worry, we have plenty of music available for your use. Please visit our AudioSwap library to learn how you can easily replace the audio in your video with any track from our growing library of fully licensed songs.
Other Options
If you think there's been a mistake, or you have other questions, please visit the Copyright Notice page in your account.
Sincerely,
The YouTube Content Identification Team

Quote from S14 DRIFT :however if you were tapping it, you could be done for statutory rape, even if it was consensuel.

In the US, it's 18. So it applies slightly differently.

UK law distinguishes between statutory rape and consentual sex with a minor, the latter whilst still illegal, carries a much reduced sentence. Something US law doesn't recognise. Technically, if you're two 17 year olds in the US, with the boy 1 day older than the girl you can get jiggy as much as you like whilst you're both 17 or both 18, but for that 24 hour period where the boy is 18 and the girl 17 if you do it, then the boy is raping the girl, and consent has absolutely nothing to do with it in the eyes of the law.

Here's something:

You buy a girl drinks to have sex with you, that's fine.
You pay a girl money to have sex with you, that's prostitution and illegal.
You pay a girl money to have sex with you exactly as before, but film it, and sell those tapes for profit, that's porn, and legal.
Didn't UK made BDSM and such "extreme pornography" illegal lately? It was something like taking part of such acts á la Mosley is ok and legal but owning material like that was illegal. Now that's f*cked up law: thought crime is here.

edit: very on topic indeed.
2

Youtube policing has gone too far >;o
(49 posts, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG