Well as you could see in the thread I made a year ago I tried to find the diversity and get input from anybody and everybody (I think a new person can put just as much useful information out there as an alien). BTW that "alien" attitude you posted Fram is more of the fast guys that appeared 2010 and after, not for ones from before when leagues were flowing and pumping out good numbers and people.
As far as progession series. I had the FIA GT idea setup for single driver championship as well. Basically GT2 was the feeder series to GT1. They were two seperate series where GT2 was like LFSCART Light and GT1 was like LFSCART. Obviously not identical replicas but you get the point. That also was supposed to help simplify who was Amatuer and who was Pro etc. It all kinda got pushed down the storm drain when GT2WS was announced.
Now when it came to big one class fields of endurance type events, we never did allow two teams to have two cars in the series to try and make them have 30 different teams or whatever (Think back to IGTC). For TBOE I'd expect it to be exactly the same, and IMO it should help people who are frightened to race come race.
Teams used to be honored to finish in the top 15 because it was near 30 different teams all fighting it out and being a top 15 was an accomplishment. Now we have to split up the field with the Pro/Am to keep spirits up. Eventhough the Pro/Am thing was done successfully in GT2WS, I still can't see the point in it. Does winning the Am class really feel better than finishing say, 5th, in Pro? I sure hope not.
But anyways, more to the point. If there was a TBOE type series, would you want a Pro/Am class to boost spirits? And if so, how do you expect to judge who is Pro and who is Am in a series that has never really been successfully run?
@Joe: I hope you poorly wrote what you were trying to say. Are you just saying the current stuff is just diluted (as in we are running the same stuff over and over) and that it becomes "easier", whether it be from already having the setup, or from already practicing it a million times before?
As far as progession series. I had the FIA GT idea setup for single driver championship as well. Basically GT2 was the feeder series to GT1. They were two seperate series where GT2 was like LFSCART Light and GT1 was like LFSCART. Obviously not identical replicas but you get the point. That also was supposed to help simplify who was Amatuer and who was Pro etc. It all kinda got pushed down the storm drain when GT2WS was announced.
Now when it came to big one class fields of endurance type events, we never did allow two teams to have two cars in the series to try and make them have 30 different teams or whatever (Think back to IGTC). For TBOE I'd expect it to be exactly the same, and IMO it should help people who are frightened to race come race.
Teams used to be honored to finish in the top 15 because it was near 30 different teams all fighting it out and being a top 15 was an accomplishment. Now we have to split up the field with the Pro/Am to keep spirits up. Eventhough the Pro/Am thing was done successfully in GT2WS, I still can't see the point in it. Does winning the Am class really feel better than finishing say, 5th, in Pro? I sure hope not.
But anyways, more to the point. If there was a TBOE type series, would you want a Pro/Am class to boost spirits? And if so, how do you expect to judge who is Pro and who is Am in a series that has never really been successfully run?
@Joe: I hope you poorly wrote what you were trying to say. Are you just saying the current stuff is just diluted (as in we are running the same stuff over and over) and that it becomes "easier", whether it be from already having the setup, or from already practicing it a million times before?