its edited a bit with more smoke but I had a lot allready when I was boiling up those tyres by purpose to have a lot of smoke.
Was a promo picture i've made for previous season of the LiveForSpeed.be league.
read between the lines? well then some of us can take it in the way we want, is that what you mean? If they don't want pics to be posted they'll have to write that in there.
Don't post, promote, link or otherwise expose modded content on this forum. That includes screenshots. If you think that ain't a rule, test it. The first time, the content will be removed (unless we're satisfied that you're aware of your actions, in which case go straight to event 2). The second time, I won't just remove the content.
Lots of our forum rules aren't written down, but they're widely known and accepted. We don't have a list of rules. When you have a list, it's easy to chalk up your own list of things NOT ON the list. People know this stuff is unacceptable. It's known. Victor's made it clear, and few people who post here are unaware of that. It doesn't need itemizing.
That's perfectly understandable but a line about this without actually mentioning it could easily be added, IMO.
At the moment, it says this:
"4) Any "mods" - modifications to the Live for Speed exe, must be discussed with a moderator before being released on the forum. If a mod is approved by a moderator, it may then be released in the appropriate section of the forum. Please do not contact a developer as we do not support mods and do not have the time to deal with them. Any mods which change the shape of a car model, or which allow online cheating or circumvent HLVC, will be rejected."
You could just add at the end: "Any screenshot or other showing of such "mods" is forbidden..." or something like that.
I say that because there have been several instances lately where a "forbidden" screenshot was posted. It was pointed out by several people but then, someone else came and posted the rule I quoted above and interpreting it the way that posting screenshots of "mods" isn't forbidden.
I just think it would clear that up and prevent this of happening.
There are two recent instances of this happening, that I can think of. In both instances, I have dealt with the subject privately. Shadowww is very well aware that his recent post on the subject is raw sewage. He knows Victor's stance and he now knows (because I have made it abundantly clear) that when his current infraction expires in 2 weeks, there will be no more new opportunities to change his behaviour to fit with this forum's expectations. I've seen and heard more than enough.