Well, the V8s in Austin was a really good show, but they definitely need to bring a softer tie next time. And planting some shade trees would be a good investment.
I hear they're looking to add a second American round. Can I suggest Laguna?
That's the most disingenuous argument you could possibly make in response. Because I don't jump to assumptions on incomplete evidence I'm "afraid to have questions outside the box"? Come the **** on.
The problem is that you're fabricating some conspiracy narrative based on a smattering of photos that don't show anything conclusive.
What you mean is that there are no established, eyewitness records available to the public (though the police and FBI have almost certainly recorded a staggering number of them), and that these photos (and videos, and the word of the authorities in charge of figuring out what happened) are all we have to go on. That's because they're the authorities, and they're doing something that's called an investigation, and in such investigations they don't routinely publish evidence for everyone to see before the investigation has been concluded.
I don't deny what's in the photos. I deny that they prove anything that you allege or hint at. And why exactly should what people say be questioned, if you have no worthwhile information to work from?
Why are you, someone sitting at a computer in Ireland, trying to reconstruct realtime events that happened half a world away from a sequence of photos? (Actually photos taken from different vantage points by different photographers.) Why are you so disinclined to trust the established, eyewitness record of what happened that you'll make up theories based on incomplete visual documentation like that?
It's like watching a frame from every third minute of Inception and doubting someone when they tell you the plot of the film.
To clarify, that particular feature on the Onion takes actual real-world events and has fake people deliver fake quotes in response. So you should have believed it, because it's true.