You just have to assign the correct axis to the clutch in the controller setup. Even if you set the gearbox to automatic you still have to put the car in gear, otherwise it will remain in neutral.
LFS won't allow you to release the E-brake until you put the car in gear for the first time. If you're using the H-shifter, make sure that you've mapped the shifter correctly and that "H-shifter" is selected in the controller setup.
Car doesn't loose power because of the cooling system. Air density decreases with its temperature so in hot weather there is less oxygen in the engine. Less oxygen means that less fuel is burnt which is where the power loss comes from.
Thermodynamically speaking just the fact that the fuel is burning in hotter environment results in less fuel being burnt (Le Châtelier's principle).
OutGauge misconfiguration. The LEDs will blink until you get first valid OutGauge packet. Don't worry, you're like the 115th person to have run into this...
The config looks good, can you try some tools that use OutGauge to verify that it works? Are you sure there isn't anything else already listening on 30000/UDP like a BitTorrent downloader?
Oh God, and I seriously thought I wouldn't have to explain this to anybody because it's so frikkin' obvious.
Shooting down a highly automated aircraft by trying to kill its crew is like the most idiotic thing to do. These aircraft fly almost by themselves and MH17 was flying on autopilot shortly prior the crash. Killing the crew or destroying the controls won't necessarily switch the automation off. Aircraft with such damage can fly thousands of miles before it crashes due to fuel starvation or some progressive structural failure.
Again, you are very wrong. Ukrainian Su-25M1 is a joke of an upgrade (sorry). The R-195 engine provides about 10 % of additional thrust over R-95Sh, that won't increase the service ceiling by 3 km. It is also not specific to the Ukrainian M1. Original Su-25 had a maximum ceiling of about 7 km in clean configuration - that means WITHOUT any weapons except for the internal cannon. Max ceiling depends quite a lot on weather conditions but even if an Su-25 managed to fist its way up to 10 km, it would be at the very edge of its performance envelope. It absolutely would not have been able to precisely target MH17's cockpit and take it out with a gun. Go look at the specs, they're all over the Internet! You also seem to be forgetting the fact that max speed of Su-25 is quite close to B777 cruising speed. Therefore it is almost impossible for it to climb high enough, catch up with it and aim weapons at it.
Even if the Ukrainians devised some sort of evil scheme, why wouldn't they have just moved one of their own Buks close to the conflict zone and use that? Or better yet, why wouldn't they have shot it down with Su-27 or MiG-29 which could have accomplished such a task easily and from 50 km away.
Russian source mentioning "similar" altitude... now that's a lead! Or rather... not.
Buk-M1 can engage targets flying as high as 72,000 ft.
The mod follows the settings in the config file. What you might be missing is the fact that the second value controls when the LEDs start to flash and not when the first red LEDs light up.
Car rendering is broken with 0.6F2. The problem is fixable by putting D3DCompiler_43.dll into LFS directory. It seems that as of 0.6F2 it's necessary to use native versions of both "d3dx9_43.dll" and "D3DCompiler_43.dll". I haven't run a benchmark yet but there seems to be some performance gain even on WINE. This is valid for an nVidia card with the latest proprietary drivers, YMMV.
Sidenote: WINE reports
fixme:d3d9:Direct3DShaderValidatorCreate9 stub
once while LFS runs. This means that this function is not actually implemented, it just returns immediately with a successful result so whatever it should do is not done.
CNN - quoting Russian sources - says that the Ukrainian jet in question was an Su-25, Soviet version of A-10. Su-25 has max ceiling of about 7 km (without any payload) and a top speed of ~980 kph. If it was there, it is VERY unlikely that it flew outside the war zone, let alone engaged MH17. Its presence could have confused Buk's radar operator but that's about it.
As much as Racer X accuses us of ignoring evidence of conspiracy he ignores evidence that disproves his nutcase theories. BTW, a very thorough analysis of the "Creation time" glitch can be found here: https://gist.github.com/klaufir/d1e694c064322a7fbc15
@Racer X:
You realize that about half of your "proofs" of a Ukrainian coverup have already been conclusively disproven, even in this very thread?
This is my theory as well. I assume that basic operation of the missile complex is not all that difficult (YouTube even has some videos with a simulator of S-75 and S-125 launchers). It is only at real wartime when there are multiple targets, enemy airplanes with antiradar missiles and strong ECM conditions when you have only seconds to find, identify and fire on the target. This is when you need a well trained, professional and experienced crew. The crew that manned the launcher that (probably) shot down MH17 was in no imminent danger and hitting one of the largest passenger jets ever to fly is not exactly a paramount of combat skills... This is why I have no problem believing that the Russians could have given the separatists some "How to shoot a plane down with Buk M1" crash course not realizing they would make such a terrible mistake.
It is not unusual for aircraft to be routed slightly away from their original route to avoid bad weather or traffic congestion. There were also two other aircraft in MH17 vicinity at the moment it crashed (https://twitter.com/flightrada ... 89843415002001408/photo/1) so if MH17 wasn't there, they could've hit another passenger aircraft.
I thought that amp88 just showed that YouTube sets the creation time one day ahead of the actual time of uploading.
It didn't. Check the tracking information on FlightRadat24.com or FlightAware.com. You'll find that it followed exactly the same path as other MH17 flights.
Does anybody know how the YouTube creation and tagging time work? I find it rather odd that some of those allegedly intercepted phone calls uploaded by Ukrainian Intelligence seem to have been created the evening before this all happened. I'm not sure if timezones would account for the difference. I'm on a pretty slow connection now so I cannot check this against my own video.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5E8kDo2n6g)
mediainfo Щодо\ збитого\ літака\ \(оновлено\)-V5E8kDo2n6g.mp4 General Complete name : Щодо збитого літака (оновлено)-V5E8kDo2n6g.mp4 Format : MPEG-4 Format profile : Base Media / Version 2 Codec ID : mp42 File size : 2.89 MiB Duration : 2mn 23s Overall bit rate mode : Variable Overall bit rate : 168 Kbps Encoded date : UTC 2014-07-16 19:11:19 Tagged date : UTC 2014-07-16 19:11:19 gsst : 0 gstd : 143776 gssd : BADC20A81HH1405792393993538 gshh : r1---sn-2gb7ln76.googlevideo.com
Video ID : 1 Format : AVC Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec Format profile : [email protected] Format settings, CABAC : No Format settings, ReFrames : 1 frame Codec ID : avc1 Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding Duration : 2mn 23s Bit rate : 69.9 Kbps Maximum bit rate : 304 Kbps Width : 480 pixels Height : 360 pixels Display aspect ratio : 4:3 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 25.000 fps Color space : YUV Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0 Bit depth : 8 bits Scan type : Progressive Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.016 Stream size : 1.20 MiB (42%) Tagged date : UTC 2014-07-16 19:11:19
Audio ID : 2 Format : AAC Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec Format profile : LC Codec ID : 40 Duration : 2mn 23s Bit rate mode : Variable Bit rate : 96.0 Kbps Maximum bit rate : 103 Kbps Channel(s) : 2 channels Channel positions : Front: L R Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz Compression mode : Lossy Stream size : 1.64 MiB (57%) Title : IsoMedia File Produced by Google, 5-11-2011 Encoded date : UTC 2014-07-16 19:11:19 Tagged date : UTC 2014-07-16 19:11:19
- Since Putin was returning from Brazil to Vnukovo airfield, flying over Donetsk in Ukraine would be a hell of a detour.
- Surface-to-air missile systems primarily use radars to guide the missiles. Visual appearance of the plane does not matter. Even if you were trying to identify the aircraft visually, the lack of 4 contrails should give you a clear info that you are not looking at an Il-96. Contrails are one of the few things you can easily make out from the ground.
- The accident you are referring to happened during a big military exercise during which 24 missiles were fired and one of them hit a wrong target. It should also be noted that the weapon that hit the Tu-154 was most likely fired from an S-200V system from 1970.
- The reported times where the flightpaths of MH17 and RA-96016 were supposed to intersect are 40 minutes apart. An airliner travels about 600 km within 40 minutes... how lousy a shot would you have to be to miss your target by that much?
- MH17 had been tracked by Ukrainian ATC since it entered their airspace. They knew the aircraft was there and where it was going. It also followed the same flightpath as the previous flights.
- Why would the Ukrainians try to shoot a Russian plane down anyway? I thought they were trying to keep the Russian forces outside the Ukraine borders.
Do you actually spend any time thinking when you're concorting these theories or do you just empty a bottle of cheap liquor and type whatever happens to cross your mind?
Updated Linux benchmarking tool for 0.6F. The results are not entirely comparable with Fraps on Windows but hopefully the difference is minimal. Linux kernel 3.4 or above is required. Run
cmake ./ make
to build. See the "privileges.txt" file to set up advanced permission caps to avoid having to run this tool as root.
It'd be helpful if they compared driver versions and installed updates on both machines. I've seen a laptop where I had to roll the audio drivers like five versions back to get the sound working...
And where exactly did you look? When I run dxdiag it reports the WDDM version and supported D3D API versions correctly. (WDDM 1.0 and 9Ex in my case). Driver that shows WDDM 1.2 support was obviously designed with Win 8 in mind.
Except that they are... you know... not. Windows 8 features WDDM 1.2 as opposed to Win 7's WDDM 1.1 and the dxdiag report Danoon posted suggests that the drivers he has currently installed make use of WDDM 1.2. There is therefore a possibility that the drivers might work correctly on Win 7 because it's only something Win 8 specific that is broken.
YMMV depending on the specific card model but I myself had a very pleasant experience with R6400M (and r600 based chip) and FOSS drivers. Even Unigine: Valley ran correcly. Hint: dynamic power management is still disabled by default on some cards so you might want to switch it on manually by specifying "radeon.dpm=1" in the kernel bootline. Besides saving a lot of power on idle it provides better performance as well.
From kernel 3.16 the attribute won't be world-writable anymore so you'll need proper access right. I'll hopefully write a udev rule to automate this before 3.16 comes out.
A heads-up for Linux gamers using Logitech wheels. Due to this change (https://git.kernel.org/cgit/li ... 5e5c99d0d657d22a7dbc69334) it will no longer be possible to easily change the range of the wheel without proper permissions through sysfs. We intend to write a udev rule to resolve this situation properly and securely.
If you don't mind getting your hands dirty a little bit you can give some minimal installation of Debian Testing a shot. You'll get updates on a rolling basis but with (hopefully) sufficient soaking period to work out most of the problems. I've also had a pretty pleasant experience with LXDE spin of Fedora 19, although I used it only in VirtualBox for some kernel hacking
You seem to be running a rather old kernel. The i915 driver in the kernel has received numerous improvements since 3.8.0 and so has Mesa (the OpenGL library). Unless you have specific reasons for using this version you might want to give another distro with newer software versions a go - or update if your distro provides updated packages. Ubuntu 14.04 uses kernel 3.13, recent updates of Fedora 20 gets you 3.14. Both of these distros are on mesa 10.1 with the possibility of mesa 10.2 arriving for F20.