This thread is a joke, right? rofl

LFSworld name: RenvoN
Driver's Name: /// L.Araújo
Nationality: Brazil
Number (00-99, 0-9): 81

Quote from JayEyeBee :

Interesting. Am I wrong when I say you can't see the restriction when viewing a single player replay?

Yep, you can't see it in-game. But are we able to see it with an InSim app maybe?

... And I have updated my post with my SPR.

LFS Licence Name: RenvoN
Real Name: Lucas Araújo
Preferred Car Number: 81
Team Name:

Last edited by RenvoN, Thu 6 Jan 2011, 19:59. Reason : spr added

Quote from CobraDrifter :

haha FAIL!

I was joking when I said it would get released 2 years later...I guess i should've been srs Oh well...

And you would be wrong!

Because it hasn't been released yet.

Name : Lucas Araújo
LFS Username : Renvon
Number : 81

Hey,

I'm just starting with Python and it may be a foolish question but here we go.

I'm using this:

to create a thread, so I can get a button that changes the text every second indicating that safety will still be on track for another lap (just like F1 Safety Car lights). The problem is, when I use CTRL + C on Putty, it just won't stop the thread, I have tried things like try/catch but no success. Have you got any idea for this? It's important for now to stop the thread when I press CTRL + C because I'm still developing so I change stuff all the time.

EDIT: Posting the function so there may be something wrong with it, also.

PS: No need to call global YellowFlags as it has been called already before I start the thread.

Last edited by RenvoN, Sat 11 Dec 2010, 16:03.

I am one of those who would pick up XRT anytime in a TBO race.

I found the problem.

At least on the stable version, it's not passing the IP correctly. I type 192.168.1.2 (which is correct to connect to my LFS) and it's shown as 127.0.0.1 on BeginInitialise().

Since I don't know how to fix that, and I needed to know if it was the real problem, so I putted:


And it connects perfectly now, so it must be a problem with getting the IP from the field.

Hope I have helped somehow!

Quote from DarkTimes :

I can't say for certain what the problem is, but that message is ConnectionRefused, which means that either LFS is not running or the host/port information your provided is incorrect.

Do you get this error on the old/stable version of InSimSniffer?

Just tested it and same thing happens.

I took an screenshot of my configs:



Everything seems to be set up correctly

My LFS is not installed, it's just a copy that I have been keeping for so many years now, so it's not in registry and maybe that's why InSimSniffer doesn't detect it.

Alright, when I try to set the path manually, I get this:


Since I wanted to use it asap and I can't expect you (and you don't have to) to be here 24/7, I tried to solve it by my own workarounding that problem.

On OnLfsExeButtonClick(), I changed:

to


Now I can select the path manually without any problem, it even launches LFS correctly. BUT, I still can't connect to my LFS.

It says:
"Make sure LFS is running and configured to accept connections on the correct port."

I tried connecting after launching LFS by my own and setting insim to 29999, tried 127.0.0.1, tried 192.168.1.2, nothing works.

Have you got any idea to help me?

Thanks,
Lucas

I would LOVE to have an mp3 player within LFS.

Real Name: Lucas Araújo
LFS license name: RenvoN
Country: BRA
Number: 24
Team: -

Stick to the thread and keep posting the pics, guys!

Blow me

Quote from Speed Soro :

And I dont see the need to be polite once the defensors of scavier temple are never.

I think LFS is a product, and Scavier is a company, and we are the clients, and we have rigths: to complain, to wait for more, to expect.

There is nothing wrong about it.

Wrong is some company that uses excuses about the sad progress of its work, come to public to say that it does what it whant to does when it want, no matter what the clients wait for or say.

Wrong is to complain about the complains.

Everybody here that defend the Scavier way to work, would not accept same treat in an hair saloon or grocery.

If your train is late, you don't say "ok, I'll wait for more 3 hours because the driver knows what he is doing".

If your doctor is late, you don't say "ok, I'll live with this pain for more months because the doctor said he is tired and get some rest".

Scavier team has no obligation to give some reports, I think. But it is a company, not a bunch of kids doing their house on the tree.

There are thousands of users around the world waiting for something, and waiting for a long time. LONG time.

So, if people comes here and complaing, first thing that this "team" must to understand is that this situation was created by them, not us.

That weren't us that come here and ask for someone to create a simulator, we didn't come here and said: Hey, you, please, develop something for us.

Second, they promise, and if you promise something, you must to make it. Pay you debts, stay there on the clock, be honest.

So, people that defends this state of the things here, saying the same old bs of ever and ever (like "if you dont like get out" and other pearls), is wrong. This side of the forum is rarely polite, and is totaly refractary about moaners and complainers.

You paid £24 for this content you have now, it's not like Devs MUST give you more content.

Quote from DevilDare :

I got a question.

What exactly are we getting in S3? A new car, and Rockingham. Is that enough content to pay another 12 pounds for?

In S2 we got 3 venues, and 11 new cars.

Dont get me wrong, I will buy S3 the minute its released, but I personally think its a bit too little for the long awaited S3.

Hopefully the devs have something else planned for it. Really hope Eric is working on another venue. Else, S3 will feel very empty and the whiners will be back couple months after the release. You can count on that.

Anyways, I'll put on my flame suit now because I heard it be raining fanboys.

In iRacing, you gotta pay more than that for a car and a track

Quote from boscho :

typical case

+1

I have a DFGT and these are my settings:

FFB in profiler - 105%
FFB in-game - 15-30% (depending on the car)
270 degrees
every other effect on profiler set to 0% or disabled
wheel turn compensation: 0.00

have fun

Thank you all

I still love LFS, racing is in my blood and even though I have iRacing, I still love LFS.

Hey there

Hope we'll have great wins together.

Quote from GreyBull [CHA] :

Always had good fun while racing with him on FOX Junkies. Grats

lol yea, gotta say I love fox

Quote from HorsePower :

Have you any idea how much effort it would be to get new people to a point where they are able to understand all the LFS coding implemented so far good enough to be helpful at all?

I'm a professional software developer in a big company and I know what I'm talking about. LFS surely is such a big project that educating new people in order to be helpful to the project would cost Scawen more time altogether than just doing it by himself. Also the code quality would clearly suffer from that.

I don't like the speed of progress of LFS either, but complaining won't help. So I play nothing or something else until the next update comes. And maybe I don't even have any interest anymore in LFS when the next update comes, but that's fine for me and fine for Scawen I think. No one really cares. Life is more than just LFS.

I'm a developer on a big project here in Brazil and +1 to everything you just said, you couldn't have said it better

Quote from SmashCLS :

While we wait we can all have fun in Indianapolis. I haven't finished the 200 laps yet, but i'm on my way, and tyre physics are f***king awesome.

If it has multiplayer and wheel support, then I'm in for some online races!

Quote from GenesisX :

I didn't see this thread before. But to tell you the truth, I suffer the same problem as the OP with my DFGT. Clockwise, it feels really smooth, but CounterCW, it feels more clunky. I used to think that it was the strength of my left and right arm pulling the wheel, but after training my left arm and right arm respectively (using the hshifter on left/right side) it seems to be the wheels problem.

However, with the FFB motors on, it seems that the problems are no longer there (or not significant)

EDIT: I believe (hypothesis, no context or proof) that it is caused by the wheel going against the gears and along with them. Well, that's what I see in my head.

Yea, I think you're right, and I have the same "problem" (I don't think it is a problem anyway :shrug