Wouldn't it just be easier to get the !top list from his lapper? This will give all the info he needs then...

Quote from amp88 :

I'm sorry, but that's exactly the kind of attitude that gets people nowhere in the programming forum. What you should have said was "You're not going to get anywhere unless someone gives you the code OR you actually learn to program.

We have an excuse. He was in WS and kept abusing admin and not following rules. So we kicked him out.

One thing luke never once abused admin
The reason i was kicked was because i never brought nothing to the team because there was nothing to bring witch is why i want my own sever, And i got kicked for begging for cash off the one person who always gave me it but he also got it back but then they realised it was being constant so they kicked me but the person who was giving it wasn't showing a good example by giving me it ohh almost forgot he was also in the team.

And thanks a million DYGEAR.

Just to be sure, you want this for a website correct? Not in game, via buttons and what not?

its for ingame m8

With LFSLapper you can do lists of pb's for all cars (although as BF1's are fastest, they do take up all the top positions), or for each particular car.

See image...

.bmp file format should be banned from these forums. JPEG please.

Tried saving image in jpeg first, but MSPaint destroyed image too much to read. Ditto for gif. And png was even bigger file size.

Quote from S14 DRIFT :

.bmp file format should be banned from these forums. JPEG please.

bmp has superior imagequality, so why should it?

sry for offtopic...

Quote from Feffe85 :

bmp has superior imagequality, so why should it?

sry for offtopic...

Because bmp has an awfull filesize while jpg has a good balance between quality and size.

If you want to share a full quality image (mp) you always can use rar's.

Quote from Feffe85 :

bmp has superior imagequality, so why should it?

sry for offtopic...

Because if you save as a .bmp it's about 2mb, when you JPEG it is around 200kbs which is much nicer both for the uploader and for the viewer.

Or use photoshop and save it as quality 12 JPEG, can't see much of a difference over .bmp then.

Quote from s14 drift :

or use photoshop and save it as quality 12 jpeg, can't see much of a difference over .bmp then. :d

+1

Regardless of file type used, my image was just to show that Lapper will do lists of PB's (for each driver ONLY on that server, and only on the current track), and with a bit of simple coding (I managed it!), you can set buttons to pick the particular car you want to see times for.

With a bit of additional work, you could probably set up buttons for particular classes of cars (e.g FWD, RWD, etc).

And I only copied that particular screen dump, as it's one of the few where I lead the pack!



PS Thinking about it, it's probably possible to put in extra buttons to choose the tracks (incl Reverse) too. Must give that some thought.

Quote from Whiskey :

Because bmp has an awfull filesize while jpg has a good balance between quality and size.

If you want to share a full quality image (mp) you always can use rar's.

rather then saying that jpg has a good balance i would just tell someone to use png.. and yes, its true that bmp is big, but its also alone to not destroy image quality

Quote from S14 DRIFT :

Because if you save as a .bmp it's about 2mb, when you JPEG it is around 200kbs which is much nicer both for the uploader and for the viewer.

Or use photoshop and save it as quality 12 JPEG, can't see much of a difference over .bmp then.

true but i rather sacrifice some bandwidth with a large file, than having a pixelated image being downloaded in 2 secs :/

but we're all right in a way so :P

OT: Happy to see that u made it work out

I'm going to pioneer a new file format that has the quality of a BMP and the size of a JPEG. Or I'm gunna program the compression thing from Obe Dobe shop (New name for Adobe Photoshop according to my mates brother!) into Paint.

Actually, the JPG compression in Windows 7 is far improved from previous versions. Haven't tried paint yet, but using Snipping Tool (Which takes screenshots or portions of screenshots), JPG quality is fine

I don't know why they don't just ask Adobe nicely how to save half-decent JPGs

I wish that MS would just scrap paint and replace it with something vaguely decent, of Paint.Net sort of quality. Surely it can't be that hard to make something that allows you to paint with Antialiasing and save pictures with out destroying the image quality

(I dunno what they've done in Windoze 7)

Quote from dougie-lampkin :

I don't know why they don't just ask Adobe nicely how to save half-decent JPGs

It's 'Not invented here' syndrome, and Microsoft suffer from it badly.