Hey,

I'm doing and going to do some reviews about games.
The makers of rFactor offered me a copy of rFactor 2 once it is ready to review

So I tried to write a little review about the normal rFactor.
And soon I will write reviews about others games too.

I hope it doesn't suck so hard

You can read it at:

http://trr-reviews.blogspot.com/


Kind Regards,

Rocky

Nice first try, but you should work a tad on your writing. Also, you should analyze other online reviews on how to structure it.

Another thing: do you really want to compete with other big review sites like IGN, eurogamer etc? I for one prefer articulated verdicts over numerical ones, as they are too subjective to be accurately measured on a scale.

Are you going to keep it limited to racing games? If so, you might want to "recalibrate" your scale a bit, because the review seems more like you trying to please ISI over truthfuly and honestly reviewring and critisizing their already quite dated game.

And lastly, I invite you to check out my blog perhaps you find it useful and inspiring. Linky: an austrian gamer

Quote from ColeusRattus :

Nice first try, but you should work a tad on your writing. Also, you should analyze other online reviews on how to structure it.

Another thing: do you really want to compete with other big review sites like IGN, eurogamer etc? I for one prefer articulated verdicts over numerical ones, as they are too subjective to be accurately measured on a scale.

Are you going to keep it limited to racing games? If so, you might want to "recalibrate" your scale a bit, because the review seems more like you trying to please ISI over truthfuly and honestly reviewring and critisizing their already quite dated game.

And lastly, I invite you to check out my blog perhaps you find it useful and inspiring. Linky: an austrian gamer

Thanks for your tips mate
And there's no chance of me competing against sites as IGN and Eurogamer :P
And by Articulated Verdicts, what do you exactly mean by that?
Video reviews or such?

And what do you mean with:
because the review seems more like you trying to please ISI over truthfuly and honestly reviewring and critisizing their already quite dated game.
?


Thanks again,


Kind Regards,

Rocky

Quote from rockclan :

And by Articulated Verdicts, what do you exactly mean by that?
Video reviews or such?

Nope. Instead of giving points, just say what you think. Like, instead of giving "7.5" for graphics, summarize it in a paragraph like: the graphics are not too detailed, but still pleasing to the eye, and as a big plus, don't need a brand new gpu.

Quote from rockclan :

And what do you mean with:
because the review seems more like you trying to please ISI over truthfuly and honestly reviewring and critisizing their already quite dated game.
?

You score rFactor way too high for two reasons: firstly, the stock content of it was always of a very low quality, and secondly, it really shows it's age. Both can be cured with mods, but you didn't specify it in your review.

Quote from ColeusRattus :

Nope. Instead of giving points, just say what you think. Like, instead of giving "7.5" for graphics, summarize it in a paragraph like: the graphics are not too detailed, but still pleasing to the eye, and as a big plus, don't need a brand new gpu.



You score rFactor way too high for two reasons: firstly, the stock content of it was always of a very low quality, and secondly, it really shows it's age. Both can be cured with mods, but you didn't specify it in your review.

Ok, now it's clear

Thanks for taking your time