the worst bit is in the end it said max is a better person for the job, now eccelstone is an ancient blithering idiot but by know means is max any better for the job, maybe he was getting max and adulf hitler confused, its not hard, both have/had a tendancy to **** everything up
what is completely retarded is that he is actually right. But oh noes, he mention the name Hitler... so it is automatically a very bad phrase and the content doesnt matter.
What he MEANT was "a strong dictator gets stuff done, cause he doesnt care what others say - and sometimes this is exactly what's needed".
THEN he gave a few examples, one being hitler (who DID get a LOT done - usually BAD, but they got done), also noting that hitler was a tad too soft for a good dictator, cause he let himself be influenced and controlled by his advisors.
What the media heard was "I wanna be like hitler cause he was teh bomb!"
Is the requirement to work in the media an IQ of at most 50??? Jeez.
Bernie seems to be somewhat misguided in his understanding of who Hitler was and what Hitler did. I'm really not sure where in normal life you'd actually get that kind of illusion about Hitler, but somehow Bernie seems to have collected it at some point. Rather a weird and distorted understanding, really.. and suspiciously bizarre.
The media definitely seems to be compounding the problem. Any mention of Hitler is automatically examined for hints of anti-Semitism. I'm less than impressed by that trend, but it's been cumulative for about 60 years now. It's a bit too witch-hunt for my taste, but understanding the politics behind The Times newspaper is important to keep a proper perspective.
For a long time it was the editors who always had a lower IQ, but now it's becoming harder to tell.
As for what Bernie says, well I'm sure this will be used as a stick to beat him with, however anyone that can link Maggie and Hitler together gets a from me .
hmm, maybe it's just me, but I don't really get what all the fuss is about.
Bernie is talking about the shortcommings of democracy, like politicans more caring for the next election and being to feared to do anything unpopular but necessary. He's stating that a strong leader (Thatcher etc.) can get it done (for the good or the worse) and thats the better solution instead of doing nothing.
I agree with Three_Jump, he was merely talking about the way dictatorships get things done, he wasn't commenting on whether or not those things are right or wrong. His comments about Hitler not really being in control towards the end are correct too, that's the reason the allies didn't assassinate him when they had the chance. Don't get me wrong, I think Bernie is a greedy little twat, but the media has just jumped on this because he mentioned Hitler.
What he said wasn't technically incorrect, but it was certainly insensitive and unnecessary, given that one of the things that Hitler "got done" was the extermination of several million people, and given that references to that "getting done" made in a positive light are prone to provoking controversy. Plus, given Max Mosley's history, it's not exactly hard for tabloid and even mainstream media outlets to make the jump. It's just stupid.
Germany prior to Hitler was in a terrible state.
Germany with Hitler in power became a superpower.
Hitler then went a bit too far, and Germany ended up in a terrible state (but with the structure to allow it to recover and become the country it is now).
Hitler did a damn good job in some ways, and in those ways is a far better leader than most in history.
Yep. Hitler 'got things done' through fanaticism, not leadership. He didn't lead Germany, he fired it up.
I could win the grand national by cutting the legs off all the horses and walking round. Technically, that would "get the job done" but that doesn't mean it's justifiable.
you mean overspend far too quickly forcing him to rob norway quicker than originally intended thus losing the war due to lack of preparation from cutting them short by a couple of years?
Personally if I was Bernie and i said that, and everyone expected an apolegy i would tell them to hit the road, he did nothing wrong, he has the right to an opinion(which may or may not be stupid) and what he said wasn't even in support of Nazism, it was stating Factual information with hes opinion.
I rather agree. The first thing Hitler did, as soon as he was able, was to imprison and torture any and all opposition, anyone who disagreed with him, anyone who was overheard questioning his policies and practices.
People who think Hitler was a good leader should by the same token also think that all those bankers that got us in this idiotic financial crisis should be praised for their insights in short-termism and cowboy boom/bust economics. What Hitler did was atrocious from the get-go.. what he did to Germany and its people, and what he went on to do to the rest of Europe. Absolutely NOTHING that Hitler did, at ANY point, deserves praise.
And we, the rest of the world, can't shirk our responsibilities either. We facilitated his sick and twisted mayhem with our vindictive subjugation of the German people after WWI. And bugger me if we're not doing the same bloody thing in Iraq, all over again. Idiots, the lot of us, and the cherry on the top of the idiot cake is definitely Hitler.