And he is also very good. Except that he does have too many accidents, but he was one of the fastest drivers in his class.
Also: http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/ ... r-raikkonen-wrc-test.html
And he is also very good. Except that he does have too many accidents, but he was one of the fastest drivers in his class.
Also: http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/ ... r-raikkonen-wrc-test.html
Now that would be fun and different.
Hamilton and Kubica storming through the forests
Edit - Just finished watching todays WRC.... Kimi at its best:
"Yeah it was good fun....... went little wide and rolled it, no one got hurt, so it doesnt matter...... *laughs*"
Gotta love him
Malcolm Wilson doesn't know shit
Well, he was pretty much punished for all of these things, he was taken out or penalized. In all his years of driving, he wasn't the fairest person of the field, but if this is all you can think off.. He might have not been so bad at all. For example Coulthard has done a lot of stupid actions aswell. Every driver has. I admit, maybe he was a dick. But he won those championships not by cheating but by driving..
He won 94 by cheating.... 94 he WASN'T punished. You're just a Schumacher fanboi he crashed his car (by making a mistake) he knew his car was damaged, so he purposefully wrecked Hill, it doesn't take an idiot to see this, you would be whining like hell if a guy like this did this in a league race in the final race of the season and there was 1 point separating him and ANY other driver, regardless if you were the 2nd place man in the league or not, you would still kick up a fuss about it, and i garentee there would be a penalty if this happened in a league.
Tsk, take it easy man. No, I'm not a Schumacher fanboy.
But to get the facts straight: when I look at the video, Schumacher ends up in the tyres and Hill can continue?
But to get the facts straight: when I look at the video, Schumacher ends up in the tyres and Hill can continue?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Australian_Grand_Prix:
There are two things that actually don't need any discussing, IMO.
1. Schumacher was one of the best F1 drivers ever
2. Schumacher was one of the most unfair/unsportsmanlike F1 drivers ever
Very well.
Still, 6 fair championships, not bad!
Still, 6 fair championships, not bad!
He's got like a logical-ilogical brain, when he knows his chances are gone he just goes crazy and does something really eratically odd. Quali in Monaco was a good example, as was the 94 title showdown.
No, his brain is quite logical.
void schumacherLogic (bool FTW)
{
if (FTW == true)
{
win_at_all_costs();
}
else
{
destroy_rival();
}
}Racing accident imo, Hill could of still slowed down but he didn;t he choose to attack the position and go on the inside in which he hit shumacher and destryed hes car and shumachers as well.
What Senna did to prost in 1990 though was a clearly unfair, purposly hitting prost in japan and ending hes hope fo the title, he even later admitted to doing it on purpose.
Fact is all the good drivers in F1 where dirty drivers.
What Senna did to prost in 1990 though was a clearly unfair, purposly hitting prost in japan and ending hes hope fo the title, he even later admitted to doing it on purpose.
Fact is all the good drivers in F1 where dirty drivers.
HOW THE **** WAS THAT A RACING INCIDENT, SCHUMACHER CRASHED THE CORNER BEFORE AND WRECKED HIM COS HE KNEW HIS RACE WAS OVER. HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE that!?
And for the record, I think no better of Senna either.
Also don't forget Prost took Senna out at Suzuka 1989 to win the championship.
He was behind him, thus he had no overlap so really he shoud of slowed down.
So why did the best driver ever #1 make a mistake to damage his car, and #2, know hill was on the inside and still turn in?
i disagree with prost taking out senna in 89, i think senna did a stupidly desperate move.
1. even the best crash 2. no overlap he was intitled to take the corner.
if they penilized him it would contridict 1989 Suzuka with Senna and Prost.
Have you seen the onboard from Prost's car? Given his turn in point it was clear he had no intention of making the corner, only of colliding with Senna. Prost on the left, Senna on the right. Prost wasn't penalised for this (he won the championship) but Schumacher was disqualified from the 1997 championship for doing the same thing to Villeneuve.
looking at that picutre ill give it 50/50 it would be much easier if i saw a full prost onboard of the incident to get a perfect example, from other angles it looks as if prost just took the normal racing line into the corner.
plus looking at the guys email address you can see whos side the person who made the picture is on.
plus looking at the guys email address you can see whos side the person who made the picture is on.
Look at the overhead shot in this video (approx 5:45).
Looking at the overhead view it looks as if prost purposely went on the inside too early to block senna who of which had no where to go, im going to say this is a 60/40 percentage of fault with Prost on 60.
i must admitt you got the perfect video there.
i must admitt you got the perfect video there.
So we have learned Senna, Prost and Shumacher are all dirty drivers yet are argubly the best 3 drivers in F1 history.
Corrected.
He said "arguably the best 3". That means they are possibly the best 3 but it's open to debate. Your "correction" means they're possibly in the best 3? Is that what you really mean or do you not understand certain intricacies of the English language?
Could you show me some videos that show dirty driving from Häkkinen?
Formula 1 ING Magyar Nagydij (Hungary) 2009
(655 posts, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG