Luciano Burti, brazilian F1 driver for Prost at 2001, said the main problem on the actual helmets are the two screw visor mouting. The carbon fiber helmets got a lot better since his accident at Spa, but at that time, there were four screws for the visor. Year after year, two of them were removed by the helmet makers... to reduce weight.
And Schuberth had already announced they'll be using a new helmet model in the European GP, with titanium reinforcements between the visor and the body, where there was previously only plastic. It's a reaction to the accident, and they say it's now two times safer than the one Massa was using, priced at US$17,000.
Who said anything about F1, he was talking about motorports?
That motorsport in general can be made safer much easier then alot of other sports
I never said its too dangerous at all i said that it may be regulated to be more safer due to recent events with Surtees and Massa
There are grand stands in F1 races as well your point is invalid.
1955 Le Mans nearly 80 people where actually killed.
Yes, he was he was comparing it to Motorsport
Its been done before(banning of group B), limiting power and making the cars more regulated in terms of build structure(it probably wont stop accidents of death but it could prevent it happeneing as frequently with more predictable cars) its all possible the problem is the aspect of the sport could/would change.
Both where freak accidents but very similar in nature.
However Surtees incident basically was an unavoidable death with something that heavy hitting you at speed, and the main safety issue there that needed to be addressed was the loose tyre rather then it Hitting Surtees.
There have been some minor Improvments to the helments after the massa incident though, but FIA will still continue to push with safety so they will basically take anything as an a example.
Safety is ever improving and will probably continue to be so untill its deemed ''Too safe.''
The two accident were not similar, and not linked, other than something hitting a driver. That's a rather tenuous link.
Not sure how you can stop a wheel from coming off now and again. Stupid people probably blame the tethers, but as the tethers worked beautifully in that accident it's not a good place to start. You could beef up stub axles so that they cannot break under any conceivable load. You could mandate that wheel nuts and wheels have to be steel. You could mandate that a particular thread form has to be used on the stub axles. But wheels will still come off now and again, especially when you hit things...
Think back to the Coulthard/Wurz accident...what would have happened had they been driving these cars? And the cover would just fail at it's mounting points in a lot of crashes.
Yeah I would simple enough. It wouldn't be the same, who really wants to see drivers going around the track in a closed-cockpit? I don't for one.
They've managed 60 years with open-cockpits, with only 26 drivers losing their life behind the wheel of a Formula One car. Two freak accidents within a week and now they're wanting to use closed-cockpits. Why change it now?
Then there's that whole aspect of safety, What if a driver gets trapped ... I could go on, but I'm sure you get the point.