2. Something accomplished successfully, especially by means of exertion, skill, practice, or perseverance.
Who's to say what his or anyone elses goal (or something) was? For me personaly as a UK resident 1,000,000 km means bugger all , having said that maybe in his own country the Km is king ..and so you can pretty much take it as a given that passing 1 million ( of what ever unit you care to measure distance with... miles or kilometers is an achievement )
it would be more of a milestone in the game itself... i doubt he has ever set out on reaching 100k... it just happens. He just happened to be the frist to reach it.
So what if we enjoy oval racing? It's part of LFS and it's an awesome teamwork event track.
I love the hating posts, some people are just that unhappy in life that they can't post something positive or don't post at all. (not directed at Doc)
Anyway, it is sad to see so many ppl to complain about reaching this milestone.
Well I am pretty sure Failure never had the goal to drive 1000000 km,
but it very simply shows a dedication to lfs, that many of you are missing.
Of course a lot was driven at the oval with fast cars but it is not about the oval, it is about the game.
This thread was not a poll and no one was asking for your opinion.
It is these flaming posts that give this forum a bad taste in general.
Rather than flaming, you should be happy that there are ppl with such a love to the game.
So congrats Fail.
PS: I wonder if there will be ever a second player to reach 1000000km.
I give credit where credit is due, and he has for sure earned it. On a more personal note, he is a great guy from the times we have spent on FM's vent years ago, I'm sure he still is just as awesome today.
Here are some interesting facts about this thread so far:
24.1% had positive comments
11.4% had negative comments
1.4% did not have an opinion
4.3% attempted the use of humour in their remarks
58.9% moved away from the subject of congratulating Mr Failure
28.6% will add up the % and find out they don't add up
0.0% mentioned that Mr Failure started off as a demo racer who liked to drift
18.4% believe that Mr Failure is an AI driver made up by Mr Scawen to promote oval racing
and finally, 100% of these % are purely made up and have been independently verified by the accounting firm of Noah Parken & Zack Lee Wright.
What is it about ovals that instantly lowers more than half of the motorsports community's IQ by 100 :rolleyes:
Kyoto Oval is one of the worst ovals I've ever driven on...seriously, the track is a pissing hatchet job.
1. Not enough banking
2. Uneven turns (especially that freak of a T3)
3. Too small to be a superspeedway, and too large to be an intermediate.
The result? Boring. Bring in a proper oval like Darlington, Daytona or Talladega then we'll be talking. Besides then? Well...oval racing in LFS with be horribly boring (unless that I-SCAR stock car mod can make a difference)
I've always found overtaking on circuits to be both exhilerating and boring at once. It's usually at the same corners that people pass (unless someone makes a mistake or noobs are racing against pros), and it's almost always about outbraking someone. Beyond that, it's all follow the leader and out hotlapping someone (which is fun in it's own way I guess :shrug
Yeh, fun in technical corners. But I'd prefer to have a constant overtaking opportunities that you would ONLY get on the oval thank you very much
Just a personal taste. Want to burn me for it? Go ahead, not like any amount of neanderthal insults is really going to make your arguments more valid. (And I have yet to hear a valid, intelligent, and objective argument against ovals)
Since when is oval racing about shoving people out of the way?
Yes...I bet more than half of the oval bashers cant even completely a single lap in a giant pack without screwing up. (Emphasis on giant pack instead of hotlapping). Would explain why the Kyoto 500 practice sessions are always a massive fail.
Meh, tristan will be tristan, whether or not he will be intentioanlly dense is completely up to him.
Technically J@tko is correct, but the British long scale billion hasn't been used for years. I doubt many in here are old enough to have used or even heard of the long scale version. I'm an old git (born in the 60's) and to me a billion has always been 1,000 million.
Anyway, what's with all this 1 million Kilo-metre nonsense. A real achievement would be 1 million miles, now that's a real mans measurement
That's quite odd to be honest with you. I know milliard is still used on the continent, but here in dear old blighty it's not really a term you'd hear much outside of the capitals financial district. But then again, i guess we are become much more "European" as each day passes.. unless of course, you'd like to confess in public that you're not actually an engineer, but are infact, a st - (chortle) a... stock broker. .. or even worse....French...
Anyway, generally speaking, in the UK a billion has officially been 1,000 million since the early 70's, so perhaps it's another pounds v's kilo, miles v's kilometre thing. The world has moved on, but the UK is perpetually stuck in 1966...now where did i put my bowler hat.
That raises another question: You use miles in the UK? I always thought you were metric, but then I noticed on Top Gear they use miles per hour.
We're going the wrong way! America (and anyone else using imperial) should switch to metric. It's so much easier. Every thing is in 10s. I imagine it would be frustrating and confusing to go from metric to imperial.
I hate to keep changing the subject, but I think this thread lost it long ago.