I'm sorry mate, but you're being so childish; your avatar tops it off. But then again, you're 15 aren't you? Mood swings? :P.
Seriously though, the only people who bring/make up the whole Senna thing are the people who "hate Hamilton". As far as I know, he looked up to Senna as a great driver when he was younger, but that's it. I find it amusing when people say Hamilton has a yellow helmet so it resembles Senna's.*
The thing is, Hamilton himself has gone on record saying his helmet is yellow (with other design features also) to resemble the Senna helmet. That's not something his haters have dreamt up.
And the Senna comparisons were first made by an enthusiastic media, hype and fanboys. It's just that the 'haters' have jumped on it because it's a stupid comparison - Senna had vastly more charisma (even before it was made extra special by his death) than Hamilton will ever have. Lewis is a product of a PR machine. Senna just wanted to be the best. Hamilton might want to be the best, but he gives the impression of being a bit brain-dead and opinionless. Yet people generally prefer 'characters' in F1 - Villeneuve (Jr and Sr), Senna, Irvine, Mansell.
Yes, Mansell. He might have had a dull voice, but you can't claim he wasn't a character on and off the track.
Vettel is the closest in modern F1, and if Sutil keeps up with comments like "'Do you know that woman?' - 'Not yet!'" then he'll become one too
He went on record saying it was because his father struggled to see him in a pack of 30 karts. The fact not many drivers had yellow lids, and that yellow is easy to spot from a distance this is why he chose that colour. His dad also suggested the ribbon effect. This is it here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m65QuNY6L4 No doubt having yellow was an instinctive choice, but it wasnt' a straight Senna copy as some make out though a pretty pointless discussion!
McLaren no doubt put him through the PR machine but he wasn't always like that btw! It's inevitable that a kid under the media spotlight age 8 would be a bit more 'reserved' as it were. Senna never had these pressures from such an early age.
He also went on record saying things which turned out to be false in Australia. Lying to the media is a lot easier than lying to the FIA. He's a Senna fan boy. That in itself isn't a bad thing, but in Hamilton's case it's just pretty tragic because he's never going to be a Senna. A bit off topic, but Eddie Irvine used to race with an exact replica of Senna's helmet.
Just watched the race yesterday. Nice GP with quite an unpredictable result, and tension all the way. Awesome to see Hamilton push even in the final lap, against all odds. I kinda like that "who does Button think he is, driving in front of me.. I'ma show I'm the friggin' best" attitude. Oh and no, I'm not a fan of Hamilton as such..
Too bad to see the RBR's out of the championship fight now, as I'm not a fan of Button or Barrichello either. I hope they're gonna put up a nice fight together!
All the haters are bashing Hamilton for looking up to Senna, then in the same breath, are kissing Senna's ass, claiming he was a deity.
Grow the f**k up, you stupid, stupid people. Especially you, TexasLTU.
I took a quick look at RTL's "story". The only "sources" given for this "quote" are an unnamed 'veteran British journalist' and that well-known purveyor of responsible and accurate reporting Sport-Bild.
For referential purposes, here is quotes from the alleged interview:
In the interview, Hamilton talks at length about how closely he has modelled his career on Senna.
Despite his reverence for Senna, though, Hamilton recoiled from equating his ability with the Brazilian's.
Newspapers/sites wouldn't survive very long if they printed articles containing errors or manufactured quotes without withdrawals or printed apologies. If it was faked not only would it have to be an faked story but it would be a faked quote (which is a big difference).
If it was real, and existed outside of anywhere else other than the news pages of a German website / magazine, or sites that have quoted the same source, then I would be able to find significantly more instances of the alleged conversation on the internet. As no other news agency is able to put a source to it, they haven't run it. Therefore, it's absolutely bunk.
Further to this, if you honestly believe that news agencies make their money by telling the truth, you are very much misguided.
Why would F1 Live print it if it was in any way dodgy? It's a reputable website as are others that have printed the same quotes.
There's a slight difference between spinning a story a particular way and actually faking a direct quote. If you think these news agencies employ layers for libel cases and they just go ahead and willy nilly print faked or unsubstantiated quotes then I think it's you who is misguided.
They are just repeating what another agency has reported. The source is dodgy, not the people that repeat the source.
If you want me to find and deliver source material for straight out lies, fake news, false quotes, spin and hyperbole, then please let me know, and I'll be glad to spam the **** out of this thread with links.
Hmmm. You sure about that, because it doesn't actually make any sense. "We're allowed to print straight out lies because someone else actually lied, not us". Got any proof of that?
Find some manufactured quotes that have been printed without withdrawals or apologies printed.
Hamilton's pass on Webber was for 2nd place on lap 5. Kimi's pass on Fisi was on lap 1 (and due to KERS).
I can't think of a time in the last several years when there was an on-track battle for the lead in the closing laps. Closest I can recall is Alonso in front of Schumi at San Marino a few years back. (But there wasn't a pass.)