Just watched the GP (I know I am late
), but I have to say it was kind of interesting, but not much happened.
I have one thing to bring up though. And somehow the commentators just LOVE to say that when someone is better, they ALWAYS blame it on the tires.... wtf?!? I mean respectfully, it could be true in terms of how well a tire can hold up at certain temps or whatnot, but still... there is a whole lot more than just the tires that can send someone to victory. I honestly think that the setups of the cars are just slightly different... If you think about the Renault versus the Ferraris, it is clear that the Renaults could be using a slight bit more of downforce. People say that the Ferraris are about the same, and that little wing on the front gives them more topend speed... but couldn't that also mean they have a bit less drag/wing?? Whatever it is, I think that it is quite possibly the cars and the drivers skill that make it all happen. They always have to say it is the tires. At least now I know they will shut up about it, because next year they said every team will be running Bridgestones. Good, now I hope they never speak of the tires again, and find something else to blame for being faster (like the driver or car!
).
Alonso was really fast, it was obvious he would win. I was hoping Schumi would have at least caught up, but he looked so relaxed and slower in the corners... hence my lower downforce reasoning. Whatever it was, the cars were very different in most areas.
Oh and I liked that camera on rails hanging in the air at the last sector, that was very cool. I wish LFS had some cameras like that
BTW, gotta love Montoya this season, lafff!!! He is a ruthless and very stupid driver in my opinion. Makes all kinds of mistakes, and blames them on the car. I heard that one lockup in the beginning of the last sector, he blamed that on the car too :rolleyes:. Seriously, he needs to leave F1, he isn't doing good there, and not a good job for McLaren either.