there is a slight kink before the hairpin but its nowhere near as close and also a lot less angeled

im just glad isi are doing all they can to stay away from their own fame-built label of substandard photocopy of lfs.

keep following, we know who is leading.

Quote from NotAnIllusion :

while the driver goes wide and off the track on to the grass, and drives on it as if it were tarmac

Yes and also it shows that typical 'offroad' reaction where the car usually bounces up and down in the grass illepall. Happens all the time when a car goes in the grass on rFactor... it is like some pre defined effect when the ground/grass is really just flat, so stupid.

Lol the comparison vids, the guy in rFactor go wide in the grass and take the second curve at the same time than the real F1 car.. just lol

LOL, you're right, that is umm.... :zombie:

just lol indeed

Quote from Tweaker :

Yes and also it shows that typical 'offroad' reaction where the car usually bounces up and down in the grass illepall. Happens all the time when a car goes in the grass on rFactor... it is like some pre defined effect when the ground/grass is really just flat, so stupid.

Sorry to disappoint you, but LFS uses a pre defined offroad effect as well, some sort of micro bumps. But it's probably better done so you hardly notice it.

The one in LFS isn't like this though. EVERYTIME a car goes off the track in rFactor (or at least in the grass and sand), it makes a sort of washy effect like it is going up and down in the ocean... like a boat! It is so odd. LFS at least rides on the shape of the track. And yes, there is a rumble effect of grass or whatever, but that is different... the entire car isn't wobbling.

Quote from J.B. :

The track modelling doesn't seem to be very precise though even though the guy in the video says something about GPS data.

I always get a giggle when somebody says they used GPS data to accurately model something.
This is something I know more than a little about. GPS data can be mm level accurate, but it takes a lot of knowledge, time and effort. GPS positions can be plus or minus 30 meter accuracy too if you just use a standard receiver with no corrections.

You also have to stitch things together correctly and if you don't know what you are doing, then the results are not good.

So, just saying you have "GPS" data, does not mean that anything will necessarily be accurate.