Hey guys,
So, I tend to go on Yahoo quite a lot and over the past week I started to look at the Amanda Knox case. I had never heard of it before, but it seemed to interest me.
For those of you that don't know about the case, here's a link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher
So, I started looking at what evidence they had and what type of stuff was going on, but I just can't figure out why she was convicted guilty. I mean, there doesn't seem to be any definite evidence against her.
So, not wanting to sound retarded if I ever talk about this in public, could you guys help explain why she was? Or why you think she shouldn't have been?
Thanks,
Shashdev
So, I tend to go on Yahoo quite a lot and over the past week I started to look at the Amanda Knox case. I had never heard of it before, but it seemed to interest me.
For those of you that don't know about the case, here's a link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher
So, I started looking at what evidence they had and what type of stuff was going on, but I just can't figure out why she was convicted guilty. I mean, there doesn't seem to be any definite evidence against her.
So, not wanting to sound retarded if I ever talk about this in public, could you guys help explain why she was? Or why you think she shouldn't have been?
Thanks,
Shashdev