LFS Forum - Totally pointless topic

#76 - brt900

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:40

Quote from Jordan2007 :You Kept Passing out Because you noticed you didnt have a penis....

good comeback but your mum

#77 - Stefani24

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:41

Quote from brt900 :good comeback but your mum

Did you really have to bring this thread's level down to the level of a 1 day old child?

#78 - brandons48

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:47

It wasn't even a witty play on words.

#79 - zeugnimod

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:55

Quote from Stefani24 :Did you really have to bring this thread's level down to the level of a 1 day old child?

Is that a rhethorical question?

Because the answer is pretty obvious when you look at the 2 people who posted.

#80 - JackDaMaster

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:10

Where did ma Mudkipz go?

Your mum jokes are so 2006

#81 - Gills4life

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:15

Quote from JackDaMaster :Where did ma Mudkipz go?

Your mum jokes are so 2006

Your mum is so 2006.

Also; your mum stole all the Mudkipz.

#82 - brandons48

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:21

I need to shave.

This is a great thread for all those little thoughts, eh?

#83 - Gills4life

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:26

I need to shave, getting a bit bristley.

And I am getting a bit of a beard aswell.

#84 - brandons48

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:28

Yeah, the big white beard isn't really your style. hehe

#85 - Gills4life

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:35

Quote from brandons48 :Yeah, the big white beard isn't really your style. hehe

:duck:

#86 - brandons48

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:39

What? We got two conversations going in two different threads now

#87 - Gills4life

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:54

#88 - brandons48

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:55

What now? Spent all that time trying to find that picture?

I was wondering where you went

#89 - Gills4life

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:56

#90 - brandons48

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:57

#91 - hrtburnout

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:59

From this:

Quote from ColeusRattus :No.
g is an acceleration value, NOT a speed, thus it would be 0.05 m/s² less. But that's still not quite true, as with the comparative "less", you still need something that the value is compared to.

Having said that, the average g for our planet is roughly 9.806 m/s², while it's 9.78 at the equator, which would mean it's only 0.026 m/s² less. As the g on the poles are 9.832 though, you're somewhat right as your fall over the equator would be accelerating less by 0.05 m/s² than your fall over the poles.

To this:

Quote from brt900 :good comeback but your mum

#92 - brandons48

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:00

Well... this is the "Totally Pointless Topic" thread

#93 - Stefani24

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:40

Quote from hrtburnout :From this:

To this:

exactly my thoughts.

#94 - dawesdust_12

Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:50

Quote from ColeusRattus :No.
g is an acceleration value, NOT a speed, thus it would be 0.05 m/s² less. But that's still not quite true, as with the comparative "less", you still need something that the value is compared to.

Having said that, the average g for our planet is roughly 9.806 m/s², while it's 9.78 at the equator, which would mean it's only 0.026 m/s² less. As the g on the poles are 9.832 though, you're somewhat right as your fall over the equator would be accelerating less by 0.05 m/s² than your fall over the poles.

I'm too lazy to find the stupid superscripted 2

I know it's an acceleration, just.. that damn 2!