No, I did not complain about the current state of the demo version. I did not say we need more cars/tracks etc. for the demo, I just gave you facts: the demo version has only 1/2 tracks, 3 cars, a lot less than S2 and like you said, there will be more upcoming cars now, but the demo will still have 1/2 tracks and 3 cars.
And the idea of this topic was to give more benefits for buying a S2 licence, because the demo will have less content. That means a bigger gap between the demo and S2.
Less to do in demo + S2 = bigger gap = more benefit for S2
Yes, LFS has problems. It is not perfect, saying something else is stupid, there is no perfect game/simulator. It's better in some parts and worse in some parts. They all have their flaws, so does LFS. And you were saying that LFS is a game that keeps on developing. I mentioned rFactor which is also developing due to mods. What I meant with "fun part of racing" (maybe I could've said it differently) is increasing amount of cars, tracks and mods, I did not mean that LFS is not fun. One day you can drive with a '65 Ferrari F1, the next day with a pickup truck on f.e. rFactor. LFS and rFactor are competing with each other and thinking that LFS does not need to worry is stupid. S3 has still a lot of work to do, but rFactor is already getting a second version with many features that LFS lack. Physics is just one part of realism.
People want new stuff every now and then, a regular driver gets bored quickly. You are an exception, a normal person might not be interested in buying a game that might not be so interesting for him in a longer run.
And why are you picking on my driving? I already said that I might buy a LFS licence, but ATM I need to focus on something else, so I don't want LFS to distract me. So yes I could afford it, but I don't wanna invest in it yet.