I think the number of cores and their speed could have a lot to do with it failing...
The program is written/compiled on a 3.7GHz dual core and works perfectly on my pc with minimal stalling.. Computers with faster or more cores would obviously handle the timers as well and better than my pc but having a slower cpu speed and/or less cores maybe means that the timers in the program can't execute fast enough to be able to stop and start the engine before the next occurence of the timers starts....
I don't really know if their is much I can do apart from allowing more adjust on the timers intervals
sorry if the post is long and confusing
-David
The program is written/compiled on a 3.7GHz dual core and works perfectly on my pc with minimal stalling.. Computers with faster or more cores would obviously handle the timers as well and better than my pc but having a slower cpu speed and/or less cores maybe means that the timers in the program can't execute fast enough to be able to stop and start the engine before the next occurence of the timers starts....
I don't really know if their is much I can do apart from allowing more adjust on the timers intervals
sorry if the post is long and confusing
-David