Originally, it was an extension to the VGA standard first released by IBM in 1987. Unlike VGA—a purely IBM-defined standard—Super VGA was defined by the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA), an open consortium set up to promote interoperability and define standards.
stretching a ratio. seriously dude. stop. think.
640x480 on a 42 inch flatscreen looks stretched because the pixels will be so big. i don't even know why i'm still posting here.
if you read the whole thread you'd see that i was/am not the expert you are on hd. i even asked for someone to explain it better to me. but you've read the thread so i can only assume that you're posting out of ignorance and you're trolling for a flame session.
tough titties buddy. i'm done with this thread. and you're knocking on my ignore lists door quite hard.
VGA standard first released by IBM in 1987. Unlike VGA—a purely IBM-defined standard—Super VGA was defined by the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA), an open consortium set up to promote interoperability and define standards. stretching a ratio. seriously dude. stop. think. 640x480 on a 42 inch flatscreen looks stretched because the pixels will be so big. i don't even know why i'm still posting here. if you read the whole thread you'd see that i was/am not the expert you are on hd. i even asked for someone to explain it better to me. but you've read the thread so i can only assume that you're posting out of ignorance and you're trolling for a flame session. tough titties buddy. i'm done with this thread. and you're knocking on my ignore lists door quite hard.
Uhm.. maybe you should learn to read then?
WSXGA+ Widescreen Super eXtended Graphics Array Plus 8:5 (16:10) 1680 1050...
But yeah.. if you're using SVGA (800x600) you must have a GREAT screen / gfxcard ^^
Perhaps YOU should read the whole thread, you just took what he said out of context. He meant he's using 1680x1050 with A VGA CABLE. He never said that particular resolution was called VGA.
again, you have only read what you wanted to see. i said you were knocking on the door of my ignore list. i did not say you were on my ignore list.
one born every minute i guess.
Well tbh i cant really care less about people who has "i will put u on my ignorelist" as the last outcome, when they cant add anything new to the discussion.. so..
well tbh i don't really care for people who don't read the whole thread before making stupid comments. and then admit that they had skipped over some of the important bits.. so....
apology accepted. oh wait, you didn't apologise. i must have read into it too much unless i'm to blame for your ignorance.
i know dude. i'm really trying to be patient with him but brick walls come to mind. i didnn't claim to be the guru of everything hd and even asked for explinations so i could better understand the sudject. but as you know with this forum. it's either flame or be flamed.
but this will be my last post in this thread. maybe he'll go back to just cruising.
Please do not abuse the reports system, 1 report per thread is good enough thanks, the Moderators are not stupid and are perfectly able to read a thread of this size when a reported post has been made.
You are both arguing and provoking each other and can either both get an infraction or both not get an infraction. Dont go around reporting other people for saying things to you that you have also said to them (don't care who started it!)
As giving out the infractions means having to send a PM im going to take the easy option and give nobody an infraction.
