this video is just filled with alot of debate in the youtube coments section alone...so i want to see everyone here's opinion

http://www.youtube.com/comment ... ments=1&v=ILjS3HGEVD4

The guy in the car is obviously the di*k. Just for braking on the road like that.

i agree that it was a dick move, but what were they fighting about in the first place?

Quote from bunder9999 :

i agree that it was a dick move, but what were they fighting about in the first place?

not sure tbh

but ya i agree...the person in the car should be at fault completely, sure the biker had a chain, but idk

read my youtube comments if you care haha

car is an arse.

but the biker deserved it too. if u think ure so cool with your chopper and your '' hells angels look '' well just dont tailgate ffs! its not that hard to understand.

I'll say it again.

DON'T read youtube comments. It's not good for you!!

i didnt read any of them. that is what i am thinking abou the video after watching it a couple times.

ofc the cardriver was a d*ck, BUT as i'm aware it's required to keep the distance, i guess it would have been choppers fault if the insurance would have been brought in.

Quote from -NightFly- :

ofc the cardriver was a d*ck, BUT as i'm aware it's required to keep the distance, i guess it would have been choppers fault if the insurance would have been brought in.

a few comments down a "insurance write off person" (not exact quote) but he assessed it

I think the term controversial is thrown around far to lightly these days.

But i mean he shouldnt have brake checked the biker nor should the biker of been right behind his bumper.
Wheres the option for their both at fault?

i added a poll

and bikers usually follow pretty close anyways, but it doesnt make it right

but the car did also drive off

Well yes, he was being way too close... but meh, brake testing LFS on others is the same, isn't it?