Even if the surroundings are rather sparse, it's gotta be better than Westhill. And admit it, half the people on this forum would sacrifice their firstborn child for a second Westhill in LFS.
Then if you havent bothered reading to understand what it is, how the hell can you come in here and start telling people its not what GT5 needs??
Go bloody read about something your going to mindlessly slag off, then come back and moan, dont just be lazy and decide your going to insult it based on your own ignorance.
And why is a track editor not what GT5 needs? and who are you to decide anyway? I couldnt give a crap about driving go karts, nor NASCAR, but i happen to think there are plenty of people who do care and they'll appreciate that. Just because something isnt to your taste doesnt mean it is devoid of value to others.
They had 2 locations available to demo the creation tool, and i've yet to read anyone comment on Toscana.
The Belgian Fens is basically the Spa region, and as we all know from the many races around Spa its a lot like Vegas you cant move for things! Its certainly not tree after tree after tree, with a pokey little hut every few miles
As for Toscana, its a very open countryside venue, as seen in the Rally clips and most notably the day-night cycle videos.
The main benefit for the course maker is probably going to be for the folks who love rallying, because the tool isnt a full blown editor but a bunch of features which the user has control over, things like frequency of corners, how aggresive they are, altitude changes... stuff like that, and each stage can be customised in that respect (so you can have twisty sectors, and high speed sectors, a lot like Nordschleife). It doesnt sound like you can customise each corner, or populate areas, its basically a track generator (course maker), rather than a track editor/creator.
A full blown editor would have been great, and a lot like in LBP there will be some absolute rubbish, but the great content will find its way to the top, but sadly it a largely automated tool, which is why i think its going to be the rallying folks, and people who crave mountain courses to cruise around. But as you say, Westhill isnt exactly Monaco, nor is Aston, but it doesnt stop them from being challenging tracks. They've had thought put into the layout, which a auto-generated track wont have, but im sure they'll be fun for many people. Some folks will do lap after lap of the green hell, some will want a constant supply of new tracks.
Last one is Toscana btw. Those classic cars just look amazing, theres a couple more on there and they look jawdroppingly good. Not really bothered about historical cars, but cant help but admit how good an image they make around there.
Cos he's constantly got a point to prove about how Forza is bad (because it's XBOX) and how GT is good (because it's SONY) based on no substance. He refuses to like Forza, whether or not he has played it.
Ya'no guys, it's not a ****ing crime to happen to like/love/enjoy both Forza AND Gran Turismo!
But I agree with Danowat, GT doesn't need a track generator, I think the track creator is more for gymkhana than anything else.
Akshully I believe, like above, the Track Creator will be more for rally folks who like to "make their own trail"
Trust me... Doing the same rally track over and over does kind of suck ... =/
Plus, as a racer, I actually enjoy all racing. Go-Karts, NASCAR, Rally.. a lot of the stuff LFS just doesn't do well yet. Actually, I've found myself playing more iRacing, but even iRacing doesn't have rally.
And as a person who plays more games than the guy who sells me games at gamestop (i made him sad, lol) I personally dislike Forza.
For 3 reasons:
Crap Handling: I mean.. Am i a brick? I understand being tight, but... even when i'm sliding i feel like my car is tight. What the crap is that.
Pitiful attention to detail: I mean, the tracks do look pretty neat. Bumpmapping is nice. But, my problem is that compared to games like iRacing, LFS, or GT5, the cars just... look cartoony. Too tall, some too wide, some just.. messed up. People tell me at work (i work in an electronics area, where we s.... I work for walmart. ._. I hate them though. At least it's not best buy. ^_^ They're douchbags.) anyways, people come in and tell me Forza looks the most realistic. I show them a GT5 trailer, then they go "Well.. uh... um... uh... PS3 doesn't have HALO!" (Legit Story. Me and my coworkers lol'd.)
Lastly, Poor Camera: I hate GT5 for it's camera. But at least their incar views look nice. Forza's just has poor distancing and crap. Mind, I play all sorts of racing games. I hate Forza's camera view more than i hate rFactors.. and rFactor has adjustable seating.
Hell... i hate it more than Arma II's camera... and that's a war game x.x though i've gotten used to it.
So, point is.... Yeah.. Forza's great for consoles.. but.... after playing the recent Nissan/Indy demo for GT5 about 4 months ago... I enjoy that more. (Plus, i live in indy.. and seeing indy... it was... almost an exact replication. I just wish they didn't do the fake wall BS. =/ They don't put tire barriers on Ovals for roadcourse versions... they use cones. ._. do not clutter my vision with crap! I want realism!
See the glimpses of the track on Tuscan countryside, that's what I suspect the Course Maker will do. Especially since Kaz did say Toscana was one of the track environment options
Hopefully variable time of day and weather on these tracks is in....
And if Belgain High fens are in, that means Kaz must have visited the area to research the landscape, which also means he was there doing Spa for GT5. All these major 24 hour tracks, it makes sense
Premium doesn't mean an expensive flash car, it just means modelled to extreme details that's all. So there are both cheap/slow and expensive supercar Premiums
Point to point tracks is in on the Course Maker, plus weather and time of day!
Hopefully you can save the random seed number so you can recreate the very exact same course again if you want.
Its the opinion of someone who proclaims it as fact and then later proves that he hasnt even bothered to spend 5min reading about what he's preaching about!
How can you make statements saying its not what GT5 needs when you havent got a bloody clue what your talking about because your too ignorant to go read about it, thats not an opinion, that just pulling pre-determined crap out of thin air. Its impossible to have a valued opinion on anything you know nothing about, and your comments proved that.
Its all on there, theres quite a lot said about it, infact it sounds f*cking epic, so read it from there (amongst all the other info from Tuesdays chat) as the photos explain some things.
They've got by far the best write-up of it all by a country mile, and didnt go leaking everything while everyone else around them was.
All your comments go to prove is that you're a pretensious, self centred, arrogant, aggresive prick, and you have the honour of being my 2nd person on ignore