The online racing simulator
Article on macro us in sim racing
(12 posts, started )
Article on macro us in sim racing
My simple and honest answer...

Sad.

Why even bother playing a sim if you are going to make some program do half of the work for you...
#3 - Bean0
I understood that Scipy used a 3rd party tool that swapped the GTR gearboxes (FXR 'box into FZR) rather than a button clutch macro when he drove for Mercury in MoE.
aaah, thanks mate. I did some searching and what I read said it was a macro. Thanks for clarifying that. Can you point me to where that's said?
#5 - Bean0
I did hunt about for a quote earlier but couldn't find one, also the site that you could get the hack from seems to no longer exist (same place that you could get WR sets from).
iRacing's great but i have seen so many cheaters in the 2 months I've played it....well doesn't really make fun to drive then.

and like DD said, why do those people even play a sim like iR or LFS?
Meh, I don't think theres as many cheaters as you think. Not to mention there's only so much you can gain by macro's in a race sim.. maybe a few tenths over a few laps.. that's not that major as a simple ****up driving could negate that instantly.
In some cars it could be up to 0.4 a lap. But hey if you want to read comedy, just read the initial macro thread on iR forum.
remember it also works both ways. For instance, if you tried the macro in the Corvette you'll lose time as it's slower changing up with it...... that's what we found from testing. However, it's much more fun driving without macros but its all down to what people prefer....
Way I see it, intentionally handicapping yourself because you want a "realistic experience" is bollocks. You race to win any way you can within the rules. You want to use button clutch? Be my guest. You want to use a slower and more accident-prone H-shifter? I'll be more than happy to pass you. That's like joining a stock-based racing series that allows suspension upgrades and refusing to use them on principle because "it's a stock-based series."

On the matter of macros, I'm a bit conflicted. I agree that they clearly go against the intent of the sim. And if they are explicitly banned in a particular competition, then you have no right to be using them. However, if they are legal and you come up with a solution that gives you an edge, via software or hardware, who is to say your creativity cannot be rewarded?
Quote from Forbin :You race to win any way you can within the rules.

true. withIN the rules. Sometimes the sport itself (sim racing here) tells you that you should win by being good yourself, not by gaining an advantage through a thing your computer does for you. [fill in RL racing team name here] are not winning because they chose one winner car and let the other crash the nearest opponents, do they?

Quote from Forbin :You want to use a slower and more accident-prone H-shifter? I'll be more than happy to pass you.

Take any car and troy will wipe the floor with you, using h-shifter and a proper clutch :-) Just a funny side note, true but not really serious.


Quote from Forbin :However, if they are legal and you come up with a solution that gives you an edge, via software or hardware, who is to say your creativity cannot be rewarded?

Different opinion here. See the tour de France - is doping legal (and in this case "creative") if it can't be proven? 100% of the top riders are able to do things no human could do without massive abuse of certain substances which may kill some of the guys.
I will stop here, before I start a stupid discussion about moral, fairness, health and Gataca...

greetz

der using-shiftpaddles-for-h-shifted-cars-and-still-is-slow-as-mr-may butz

Article on macro us in sim racing
(12 posts, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG