not any more than determining which weeks to run races on... every other week is okay, but when they start doing 2 and 4 week breaks, how else do they expect people to keep paying attention?
For once I agree with Max, though I guess I'm gonna be one of the only one here.
Honestly, I don't want F1 to take NASCAR style schedules. For some of the complete motorsports nutter it might sound awesome, but I really don't think the whole basic fanbase would follow watching all races if it goes beyond 2X a year.
That said, if sticking with 20 races means loosing all classic European venues, then I'm of course all for having more races.
The biggest thing that needs to change is where the races are held after each other, ike for example in the last 3 races we went from South korea to Brazil and then to UAE a massive amount of travelling for 3 races.
right now it goes: Asia > Europe > Canada > Europe > Asia > Brazil > UAE.
What I think should happen: Asia > Europe > Americas(Canada/Brazil and USA when it comes)> Europe > Asia(finishing with UAE if they must).
Haha love this, the "2nd Lotus a.k.a owned by Proton" agreed to partnership with Renault (New name Lotus Renault GP) so there will be 2 different Lotus teams. And the Proton stole apparently the golden/black livery concept from the Lotus owned by Tony Fernandez.
All these "Renault" teams... Hope we don't see too much happening of what we saw in last GP... Renault teams blocking to let another Renault backed team gain victory ect...
I assume you are talking about Alonso-Petrov
yes that technically happened, but because it was a race for position, not bc it was a Renault team... totally ok. I would have been pissed if Petrov had moved over, that's just not right.
dude, it doesn't matter if that car was a Renault, a Mercedes, a Williams, or a Red Bull... unless the car was painted bright red, it would not let Alonso past, and shouldn't have let Alonso past, regardless of engine. There was a race going on.