It will give you 700+W at peak. The reason it died wasn't because it wasn't efficient enough. Efficiency is just what determines how much money and energy is wasted through heat.
Hopefully getting an Antec 900, and a 60GB OCZ SSD , and maybe an extra 17" monitor to run triple screen. Will update post for updates in rig. God thank you, Boxing Day
AMD Athlon II X2 220 ~2,8Ghz, if i had another motherboard, then i can unlock it to X4, but i have HP motherboard and its locked
Nvidia GeForce G210 (512mb DDR2)
4GB DDR3 Ram.
500GB HDD.
HPS2031a Monitor, 20" .
Windows 7 32bit Proffesional.
Keyboard and Mouse.
And hopefully next week i have G27 wheel , already ordered .
LFS runs about 80-120fps all the time, sometimes in online about ~70fps
Well.. I can post the rig I won in a competition.
Corsair 800D
Asus Rampage III Extreme
Intel i7 980X
12GB Corsair DDR3 RAM
2x XFX Radeon HD5970
2x Corsair 120GB SSD (240GB in RAID0)
4x Western Digital Black 2TB (about 5TB in RAID5)
3x Eizo 24" 1920x1200 (overkill, because they're meant for photoshopping and therefore costs too much)
Logitech G27 with pedals adjusted for easy heal-toe
I'd like to play some more intensive games. Just haven't made it to the store and buy them yet. (they're probably stupid console ports too)
And the rig I've spent my own money on.
mATX case from the stone age
Gigabyte G33M-S2H
Intel Q6600 @ 2,4GHz (I experience overclocking problems atm)
8GB OCZ Blade DDR2 RAM
Sapphire Radeon HD4850
Seagate 120GB SATA
Western Digital Green 1TB
Benq 24" LED 1920x1080 + Random 19" 1440x900
This is the final time I intend to pollute this thread with my computational incompetence [I might actually buy a computer soon ], but are there any significant bottlenecks or weak areas I should take note of in this system? I think I've done enough reading up on components to not have selected something dodgy. Thanks
- Intel® Core™ i7-950 (3.06GHz) 4.8GTs/8MB Cache
- ASUS® P6X58D-E: DDR3, USB 3.0, SATA 6.0GB/s, 3-Way SLI
- 6GB KINGSTON HYPER-X TRI-DDR3 1600MHz
- 1280MB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX470
- 600W Quiet 80 PLUS Quad Rail PSU + 120mm Case Fan
Thats a bit far filur, the i7 in the spec isn't 'new tech' and you can argue end of life but hardly obsolete. There is nothing out now, and I doubt for quite some time, that will cause the i7 950 to not be quick enough.
@ JO53PHS: Sandy bridge is out, they are quicker but then it is more expensive. I would say it depends what budget you are on but the i7 you have specced will be fine. What will the pc be used for? and what is your budget for this new pc?
Just for the record, I'm not building this PC myself because I lack the time / knowledge to do so, but my budget is about £1000 or under, built.
I wasn't aware of Sandy Bridge before, but having done some research it's definitely a consideration. The decider will be how much more an i7 2600 or 2600K is going to cost over an i7 950 in a built system.
As long as the PC performes decently, I'm not overly fussed that it is using a slightly outdated processor. You can wait and wait and wait for new technology, but at the end of the day whatever you chose will likely be superseded by something new a few months down the line.
I'll mainly be using this PC for games (LFS and occasionally some others), Photoshop, Basic CAD (i.e. sketchup, maybe Autodesk later - pending free educational copy :tilt as well as the usual MS Office school stuff. I sometimes do a bit of stop motion animation stuff, which requires a fair bit of power when compiling hundreds of large (Full HD) pictures into video.
I could maybe get along with a lower spec computer but I want it to be vaguely future proof and last a decent number of years.