Because nobody is interested in shoving a million dollars out into a 6 car length track that only makes left turns. We already have the ALMS.. Nascar is well.. nascar.
It has ford, Toyota. etc. But for factories.. nada
because the point of a works team is to have technical advantage, while stock car racing is all about making sure no team has a distinct technical advantage.
That pretty much sums it up. If there was factory teams in nascar, there wouldn't be a big turn out at events because all the lesser teams would'nt even dare make a attempt.
Thought so. I remember one of either SPEED's shows or CBS (before they lost the rights) explaining bout it or possibly one of the season reviews on about it.
IIRC Evernham's team was factory support in all but name for a few years
ESPN needs Ken Squier back, he's a brilliant narrator
"Manufacturers reportedly poured more than a half-billion dollars into the sport last year [2008] through factory and technical support to the teams, track support, vehicle programs and advertising."
Basically, this is your answer. Though dodge has no "factory team", I have seen multiple NASCAR cars (?) down by the windtunnel section in the Chrysler building
also, there was this car which at least carried manufacturer sponsorship:
That's the Evernham car someone mentioned that both Bill Elliott and Kasey Kahne drove. It was sponsored by Dodge Dealers, but had a heavy Dodge backing.
Penske I believe gets that Dodge backing now. Roush/Yates gets Ford backing. Redbull/Gibbs get Toyota backing. Hendrick and RCR gets Chevy backing. Pretty sure that's how it works. Chevy is on many cars so its hard to know if they back any.
The way I see it is this: Each make has it's own separate engine program for the most part that is highly backed by the manufacture. The susension and aerodynamic work is all left to the teams for the most part.
Yeah and it gets me irritated sometimes when people are like "Well the Toyota engines have more power than the rest." I say "No, GIBBS engines are more powerful, TRD engines have shit power." There was a test at VIR last year, and Marcos Ambrose and Jeff Gordon decided to swap rides, and Jeff said he couldn't believe how much less power the TRD engines actually have.
I remember that exact test you are talking about. I remember how they tried to cover that up by saying: "VIR is alot like Infineon. Doesn't require alot of power because it has many slow corners, and rear tire wear is important. The last thing we would want to do is destroy our rear tires."
because it's impossible to apply a little less throttle when needed excuse invalid. try again. Especially with Marcos Ambrose behind the wheel...
EDIT: I am struggling to find a time and a place where less horsepower is a GOOD thing... within reason of course, a 5,000 horespower beast would be nearly undriveable