and i hope you can understand why there's a slight smell of cow pats coming from your posts. it's nothing personal. my bs filter is highly tuned and nothing much gets past it.
heres what i got- downgrade from dual monitors but more real feel with the cockpit- made by myself- wheel is on hinges and ducks under monitor-another peace pops up for kb during none racing games
hi Guys i play lfs for 3 years now i REALLY like it i create now Cruise Servers in LFS Demo and going to upgrade to S2! i also want to share my computer specs!
My Computer Rig That is build by myself!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Core i7 Quad-core I7-950 3.06GHz @ 4.12GHz
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Ram: 16GB of ram
OS: Windows 7 and Hackintosh (legit Snow Leopard DVD Upgraded to Lion)
HDD: 500GB + 2TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Macbook pro 13"
13-inch: 2.7 GHz
2.7GHz dual-core
Intel Core i7
4GB
500GB
Intel HD Graphics 3000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iphone 4 White Officialy unlocked WAITING FOR IPHONE 5
NZXT GAMMA Classic Series ATX Mid Tower Interior Steel Chassis (Black)
AMD Phenom II X2 560 Processor, Black Edition @ 3.3GHz (Now unlocked to Quad B60) G.SKILL Sniper 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1333
ASUS Socket AM3/AMD 760G/A&V&GbE/Micro ATX Motherboard s M4A78LT-M
Diablotek DA Series 600-Watt ATX Power Supply
Sony 24X SATA Internal DVD+/-RW Drive
Seagate Barracuda 500 GB 7200RPM SATA NCQ 16 MB Cache
Sapphire Radeon HD 6850 1 GB GDDR5 VGA/DL-DVI-I/SL-DVI-D/HDMI/Display Port PCI-Express Video Card Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Yep, exactly 6TB.
But due to 2TB disks being ~1.8TiB (and windows shows TiB's, not TB's, while saying that it shows TB's - epic fail from it's side), it's around 5.4-5.5 TB.
it's a tidy system. i'm a bit of a raid noob. would you recommend switching to a raid setup? and if so, what would it entail? i know i could read up on it over on google. but i find it much easier to just ask someone who is using something i might be interested in.
RAID-0: performance scales linearly with number of drives, but one drive's death = loss of all data
RAID-1: all data is mirrored on all of harddrives, no performance increase but data is very safe. Usually used with 2 drives.
RAID-1+0: combination of RAID-0 and RAID-1, needs at least 4 drives. 1 drive death won't cause any data loss, death of 2 drives can (in 50% of situations). Performance is doubled.
RAID-5: one drive can die without any loss of data, more drive fails -> data loss. Read performance increases by number of drives minus 1 (6 drives = 5x speed), write performance depends on RAID controller (Linux running mdadm would be 2nd best option, 1st best would be dedicated RAID card).
RAID-6: same as RAID-5, but 2 drives can die without data loss.
thanks.
So, RAID-5 or 6 would be the best choice. how much pain is involved in making the switch. i'm assuming i'd lose all data on my current drives as they will be used in raid (backup data i know).
but yeah, thanks for the insight. i think i'll look into this a bit deeper. Joke
still think you're a harelipped gobshite though. lmao.
well, i thought it was a chain. come on crazy face, don't turn this into another roasting. i thought we were having fun. but you don't seem to have your funny cap on.
to say to someone that "I'm only yankin your chain" is a figure of speech. i know you don't have chains. i could have said "pullin your leg" or "pullin your pisher" they all mean the same thing. but what they mean is "I'M JOKING".