I don't understand why they are saying "The conviction will be a blow to Sutil's hopes of returning to Formula 1 in the future" because if this matter had been settled earlier Sutil might still have a seat in F1. If anything the sentence know that it is known and certain will help him to find a seat for 2012 and onwards. The conviction was never going to be a problem as long as it was going to be a suspended sentence. What was the problem was the uncertainty about whether it was suspended or with bubba.
Having a suspended sentence on you definitely does not help getting any drives though although I'd personally still replace trulli with sutil in a hearbeat (have I mentioned this before? ). I just don't understand how trulli gets to keep his seat after the totally useless 2011 season. Heikki absolutely beat trulli on every area and heikki is not imho a top driver in f1 so trulli must have been really really bad. Kubica in full body cast would have probably done better job than trulli imho.
Anyways, mclaren car release tomorrow. Interesting to see what the car looks like.
Statistics:
1. Who will win drivers' world championship: Vet 31%
2. Which team will win constructors' world championship: Mcl 57%
3. How do you think Brüno Senna will do in 2012 (rate 1-10): 5,8
4. How do you think Kimi Räikkönen will do in 2012 (rate 1-10): 6,2
5. How do you think Nico Hulkenberg will do in 2012 (rate 1-10): 6,4
6. How do you think Romain Grosjean will do in 2012 (rate 1-10): 6,6
7. First driver you think will lose his drive during 2012: HRT
8. Will Caterham score points in 2012: Yes 69%
9. Do you think Massa will win at least one race in 2012? No 75%
10. Does Kubica drive F1 car before the last race? No 62%
11: Winner of Australian gp: Ham 50%
12. Winner of American gp: Ham 31%
13. How many points will the dwc winning driver have at the end of the season: 254,75
less conservative? F-duct, those crazy U shaped sidepods... they certainly haven't been conservative aerodynamically. So I guess they must be talking about something mechanical.
McLaren need to be more conservative in my opinion. They need to build a solid car instead of trying to innovate and trick their way into the lead. Look at Red Bull, at Silverstone they stripped away all the gimmicks and innovations, and utterly destroyed McLaren, because they have a solid car that works even without double diffusers, blown diffusers, F-Ducts, KERS...etc. McLaren builds a dog of a car, then tries to innovate their way around its flaws, it usually works, and by the end of the year they have the best car, but then they ****ing scrap it and start over.
Looks like a nice car, less like they are trying to do something new for an advantage so hopefully they having a less radical car equals more time spent making it quicker.
Interestingly looking around, every shot I have seen come out so far is front, side but none of the back - wonder what they are hiding back there.
To be honest, the MP4-27 actually looks pretty nice, even with the chrome and all. Glad that 2012 holds something nice to look at during the races when they get boring.
I somehow expected one of the top-teams to have a traditional low nose. Let's wait and see if Red Bull, Ferrari and one of the close followers have a similar nose.
I really really hope they to. If only the rear wing would be allowed to be wider, the 2012 McLaren would be one of the best looking F1 car since a while.