Oh well, I usually drive a heavy van with steel bumpers, so you just annoy me, but in the case of crash I win. You are guilty of an accident, and I spend insurance money on sweets.
You aren't even funny, and your car makes you drive like a grandma.
I got stance. My truck can go so low the chassis rails are almost dragging on the ground or high enough that I can drive over most stanceworks cars without any issue. Yay for airbags.
Yes, in the village I live in, recently has had a new speedbump around the school area, which I think is one of the highest ones in Finland, and it somehow managed to break my older car's front shocks almost completely (I was being careful but it wasn't enough) But it was a 100€ pisstake so I couldn't really bother anyways, I tossed it quite quickly to a scrap yard, all I can do now is just give you a picture of which car was in question, I don't think I have ever showed a shot of it here
the bumpers were just way too high compared to the undercarriage, the structures etc. thingies were like 0,3cm off the ground!
Uhm, the rocker panels look to be nearly on the ground and from this angle the back appears lower than the front.. was there a fat chick in the trunk, cause nobody's in the back seat.
I don't care how low or high your car is, as long as you drive normally and don't cause any troubles. But most of the slammed car drivers are too paranoid to break something and cause danger.
Might be the lighting/dirt/rust that's making it appear different to me, (but to everybody but a ginho), it's pretty low just the same.
Also, bumpers aren't there to protect undercairages from speed bumps, suspension is.
Same thing around here. What's ironic is most of the local examples aren't worth worrying about anyways. There're laws in my area for trucks that get jacked up too tall/tires don't fit under fenders etc, should be the same for cars that're too low & whatnot!