Seriously, why some of existing creatures, so called "petrolheads" consider all the old shit (like Audi 100/200, Jettas or Mk1 Golf') with ridiculous drop and 22' spinnin' wheels as "sexy cars"? I thought ricer-ism is a crime against humanity...
On the other hand, THIS is a sexy car, not some cardboard and aerosol paint pimp'd civic driven by self-satisfied-impotent.
If' you're just being ignorant please don't waste your time posting anywhere.
How many of those "self-satisfied-impotent" drivers have you met so far? And by the way if you think dropping a euro car plus fitting in some classic alloy wheels (don't know where you saw spinners...) makes proper rice then you have no clue of what that even means.
That Evo 2 is also a matter of taste. The wing, wheel arches and bumpers/side skirts don't match the original boxy design of the 190. Looks kind of works-riced. Not doubting its performance but with this being a thread about sexy cars I'd much prefer the Evo 1. No matter which one but I think they both look better in race trim.
Oh and sorry about those 22" ricer-wheels and the cardboard front splitter.
most jap tuners are really a matter of taste, I for my part think the R32 is an ugly pig, but the FD really is a timeless design. Imo Mazda could sell it again today, maybe with a newer better engine tho (16X or, omg, a Skyactive fourbanger)
So it should stay with a massively high ride-height and high profile tyres? Ok. I mean sure the camber is a bit excessive but the car looks better when its sat down like that.