I dunno.... What we've gotten stuck with in the US Presidential election is an embarrassment. It really is. But the rest of the world really can't say much. look at their leaders and their policies... But mind you, this is just the political end of things. The actual people in all our nations ain't so bad on average. We just have a bad habit of putting stupid people in power throughout our histories here and there. For every Obama, there's a Sarkozy. For every Mitterand, there's a Thatcher. For every Thatcher there's a ....Fujimora.
So what we ought to do is treat political leaders tha same way we do Pro Sports Athletes and Heavy metal musicians. Keep them around for a few seasons then trade them with some other country for somebody else. Or get rid of them because of "creative differences" and add a new MP to the line-up. You know something like that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9f4wSYATh0&ab_channel=bigtone1103

And maybe think about this....

Clinton winning Arizona because of voter suppression... obviously corrupt. #RacerXSaidSo

Do come out from under your rock and try listening to the news !

Hillary Clinton has been accused of orchestrating voter fraud during Arizona’s Democratic primary vote on Tuesday, as thousands of voters have complained that their votes were unknowingly changed to independent – preventing them from voting for Democratic rival Bernie Sanders.
Authorities have announced an official investigation into claims that the Clinton campaign were part of a vote rigging scandal to prevent Bernie Sanders from winning the State.



"Leaders from the Arizona branch of the Democratic Party have confirmed that its lawyers are officially making an inquiry after multiple Democratic voters showed up to the polls only to find that they were listed as independents, Republicans, or had no party affiliation at all.

Many voters wound up having to wait in line under the hot Arizona sun only to find that they were ineligible to vote for the candidates of their choice. To add insult to injury, the polling locations have been so poorly planned that many voters had to wait in line up to four hours before finding out that their information had been improperly filed."

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1649941911932852/permalink/1655874224672954/
I posted earlier about my being denied my legal right to vote this morning. I went to the Pima County Recorders office and video taped the whole thing. Here’s what they are doing. They are copying voter registration cards changing the date and the party preference. They can’t change the original because that goes out to the party. At first she tried to say I sent in a second voter registration card (of course I didn’t not) then she changes her story to its a computer glitch then states it’s an error.

And historical national data shows this... - A statistical analysis of the 2008 to 2012 vote results revealed that widespread electronic vote rigging taking place, exposing that over 1 million votes were switched from other GOP candidates, to Mitt Romney, during the 2012 GOP presidential primary.

“This substantial effect exceeds reasonable statistical bounds and we calculate that the probability of such election results happening by chance is beyond typical or even extreme,” Francois Choquette, co-author of the analysis said.
http://madisonvoices.com/pdffiles/2008_2012_ElectionsResultsAnomaliesAndAnalysis_V1.5.pdf

Sweet, Cruz's latest is wonderful. As almost every " BABY JESUS SUPPORTS ME" type person, it was only a matter of time till something like this came out. And at Easter !!!!!!!!

And remember, I was on record ages ago saying Mittens would be the nominee. Good thing I put some money on that a while ago.

A:(Choose not to put the document up, but easily found with google; "TEXAS POLICE REPORT FROM 2005 CLAIMS HEIDI CRUZ WAS "A DANGER TO HERSELF" WHEN OFFICERS FOUND HER SITTING NEAR AUSTIN EXPRESSWAY")

B: CRUZ ALLEGEDLY PAID "HUSH MONEY" TO CARLY FIORINA.

C: WASHINGTON TIMES REPORTER CONFIRMS STORY



D: Bubble boy had been hinting at this, but given the dirt on him, choose not to release it.

E: BREITBART HAD STORY BUT CHOSE NOT TO PUBLISH.


And the main one...

F: THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER WAS RIGHT ABOUT JOHN EDWARDS, TIGER WOODS AND JESSE JACKSON.


This is better than Daytime soaps.......

NOTE: Headline earlier changed because it was pointed out correctly, Senator Ted Cruz does not actually/technically deny the allegations. Instead Cruz is attacking the story of them: “the attacks are garbage”, “the smears are false”, etc. In essence, professional lawyer speak.

Today Senator Ted Cruz obfuscated the scurrilous claims and strangely blamed Donald Trump for the story. Senator Cruz took to Facebook with a post about the National Enquirer story:



Beyond the story itself there’s a few presenting elements which point to a high degree of confidence, and as a consequence ‘legal avoidance’, on the publishers’ part.

Firstly, they post pictures of the collective mistresses. NE would never legally “go there” if they did not hold a very reasonable certainty the outlined players were factually part of the story.

Secondly, there’s at least one face in the group that is easily identifiable.

When you accept the NE editorial/legal requirement for research and attributed comment prior to publication, you recognize there is more than a strong probability each of the outlined group (pictured) was contacted prior to publication; and one of those is very close to the Donald Trump campaign. Ergo, it’s entirely likely presidential candidate Donald Trump knew this story was coming out.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/03/24/the-national-enquirer-runs-story-of-multiple-ted-cruz-affairs/

And, why should Hillary's crimes and lies not get brought into the filth fest. Just remember, no matter what Ted has done, he is still in Kindergarten compared to the actions of the Clintons

Quote from Racer X NZ :

Sweet, Cruz's latest is wonderful. As almost every " BABY JESUS SUPPORTS ME" type person, it was only a matter of time till something like this came out. And at Easter !!!!!!!!

.... Look at Cruz. He's lucky to be able to have the wife he's got. I would imagine prostitutes would triple their rates for his business. He's just CREEPY. Breitbart.... You should look into them more. Especially an incident concerning one of their (former) reporters at a Trump rally and the aftermath from it.

National Enquirer? Name a tabloid owner whose a good friend of a republican presidential candidate that isn't Cruz?

But wouldn't it be funny as hell if it was true?
"In other news"... Bernie Sanders admits to having sex - 15 years ago - he thinks.

Oh and the "vote gate" in Arizona" Yeah. honest mistake by dishonest people and handled badly by incompetent people. Who the hell knew there were that many democrats in Arizona? Ever been there? Even the DNC underestimated that number. That wasn't done on purpose. HR Clinton had that state already.
here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GUJu4cr3YU

Even 66% of Americans can see that your elections are a joke !

Washington, March 26: A new Gallup survey released on Friday showed that that around 66 per cent of Americans believe that the process of presidential election in the country is not functional.
They said the system is in a shambles while only 30 per cent was convinced about the election process. The figure was 37 per cent in January, the poll said.

I'm not a Cruz supporter, so don't expect any support from me.

Amanda Carpenter and Ted Cruz got matching Tattoos on the same day.

The truth behind the rumor-mongering, however, is a little more complex. A half-dozen GOP operatives and media figures tell The Daily Beast that Cruz’s opponents have been pushing charges of adultery for at least six months now—and that allies of former GOP presidential hopeful Marco Rubio were involved in spreading the smears.
The Breibart source confirmed that they’d received the #video from “a Rubio ally,” but ultimately decided against running the story because, “There was no way to verify the claims.”

# Cool, video of Cruz..........
I think I'll avoid watching that one...........

And, as another curious reason why Breibart may not have run the story........, "Several people have queried why they would be getting Ted Cruz campaign donation requests/solicitation directly from Breitbart, and/or getting donation requests from Ted Cruz on Breitbart letterhead."

"Perhaps I’m the last person to discover that Breitbart is essentially a political operation of the Cruz campaign – but this is akin to realizing the Clinton Global Initiative is the financial underwriter for the New York Times."

After all, this unique and unconventional relationship means Breitbart Media has a vested financial interest in Ted Cruz’s candidacy, and a profound conflict of interest for any political editorial surrounding the ongoing 2016 Presidential Primary.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and now you know…..

Brietbart is in Trump's camp. After the reporter incident at the Trump rally and the editorial staff deciding not to make an issue of it, most of the people left.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/03/14/breitbart-reporter-editor-resign-over-response-to-alleged-assault-by-trump-campaign-manager.html

66% of the people huh.... Look at how many believe in ghosts, UFO's and that Elvis is still alive.
Also, the poll is vague very vague as to what exactly it is that these pollsters think are messed up.
What some of that number may feel is totally messed up, other are fine with and dis-like something that the other think is fine.
My beef isn't with the election process - vote wise. I understand the mechanics and see that weighing in all the pros and cons, it's the best way we can do this.
My problem is gerrymandering of districts. That right there pretty much kills off rigged voting machine conspiracies. Why bother if the district is already rigged to begin with? They get the courts to redefine or create congressional districts. And it's done in a way to insure party votes from that district.
Like say the republicans want to have more congressmen in the house. Instead of coming up with quality candidates that should be able to just get more votes on merit over his opponent, they re-shape the district to where the major demographic is now republican voters. Thus giving them an additional seat in congress and only having to use a moron as a candidate. The votes come automatically.
Most of those 66% polled fail to realize this. And they equally fail to realize that many of themselves actually support this gerrymandering because they think it benefits them. They don't realize that that is the main source of our political processing problems.
Yeah notice how that works - no candidate with any real issues runs anymore. Who wants that anyways? Nope. Now it's just some clown spouting off buzz phrases. All that matters is if they have a "D" or and "R" in front of their names and the ratio of "D's" and "R's" in their particular district is in their favor.
Too many of one letter? Don't resort to compromise and inclusion to get their support, just re-draw the damned district boundaries so more of the desired letter group is in it.

Quote from Racer X NZ :

Even 66% of Americans can see that your elections are a joke !

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and now you know…..

You wanna know something? I talk more about the American Presidential election with you than I do anyone else. And when I do get involved in a discussion, it's usually with a semi-Cruz supporter that actually what they call a low information voter. They, like me probably won't even bother to vote to begin with. I hear in Australia you can go to jail if you don't vote. LOL Atom Ant said I should move. Well can't go there. I'd be writing in Charles Manson for every position just on principle. Why bother to vote If you don't like any of them running? The only one I'd consider at this stage won't get the nomination anyways. That's that Denmark wannabe Sanders. The moment he described himself as a Socialist gave him the same results with mainstrweam America as What Trump did when he came up with the wall nonsense. Still trying to figure out how that Wall will be built and how Mexico will be so willing to pay for said wall. My daughter-in-law has family in Matamoros and Reynosa Mexico. WE also have friends and family all along the Rio Grande, on both sides of the border and in Monterrey and Jalisco state too. Jalisco's (Guadalajara) Mexican food is ALMOST as good as Houston's. Also, being Houston we have a lot of Muslims here. A lot of them are @ssholes, but not suicide bombers. And of course it's real hard to have a bad feeling about Muslims when one of our best citizens, former NBA star Hakeem Olajuwon is one himself. He actually lives in Jordan now but has all sorts of ties here still. I sorta knew one of his brothers and he gave a friend of mine two autographed basketballs. That's an interesting person. Yeah, believe it or not, most Americans know the difference between a Muslim and a psycho quoting Koran verses to justify their stupidity. The media just doesn't like to show that.
So no. We're not going to be Trump supporters when he gets the nomination. And since English is a second language for most of my area? They're going to go with Clinton. I see her making a big dent in Texas. The attitudes on immigration from the Republicans took care of that. Cruz? LOL I'm from Texas and have posted what I think about him. The only people that really support him are die hard republicans who don't have a choice and the ever shrinking base of social/religious conservatives. And then there's. Hillary Clinton. Won't vote for her. I dunno though she might just win Texas, no matter how hunch she's disliked here.
So instead of using my vote to vote against a candidate, which is what most Americans do anyways, why vote for either when the choices seem equally bad?

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/25/donald-trump-former-mexico-president-vincente-fox-im-not-paying-for-wall

In any reasonable Democracy Bernie would be the choice of most voters. He has a proven track record, he's honest, he hasn't committed treason, the only thing against him that I can see is his age.

Good thing the US isn't a reasonable Democracy then........

"The Sanders appeal is twofold. He is seen as unusually honest and consistent for someone who’s held elected office for much of his life, plus he advocates a refreshingly anti-establishment view on core issues that matter to an increasing number of Americans. These include militarism, Wall Street bailouts, a two-tiered justice system, the prohibitive cost of college education, healthcare insecurity and a “rigged economy.” While Hillary is being forced to pay lip service to these issues, everybody knows she doesn’t mean a word of it. She means it less than Obama meant it in 2008, and Obama really didn’t mean it.

I just finished watching a surprisingly good and honest 14 minute segment on MSNBC’s Morning Joe which covered how the Democratic National Committee has been rigging the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton. Host Joe Scarborough even went so far as to admit the media’s complicity in the process with regard to superdelegates. He notes:
“And I know the Republican party wishes they rigged the process as well as the Democratic party did right now, because they could rig it against Trump — but the Democratic party rigs their process so that these superdelegates, which by the way can move any direction they want, actually skew the process and the reporting so badly that the voters actually don’t have their say when it comes to voting.”

http://www.xrepublic.tv/#!MSNBC-Host-Admits-Democratic-Primary-Rigged-While-Station-Simultaneously-Rigs-Coverage/cjds/56faf2b50cf2c25af4c74203

Why does it all come back to 'Election Rigging ?'. AND that is NOT voter fraud which seems minimal, rather it seems that certain groups have the power to manipulate a large number of 'votes' that are recorded in the direction they choose.

USA = CTD ----- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cg6Ku3rRnY

FYI - Real Clinton dirt, Put that knowledge with this, If anyone can come up with dirt on Bernie, I've yet to find it......

Quote from Racer X NZ :

In any reasonable Democracy Bernie would be the choice of most voters. He has a proven track record, he's honest, he hasn't committed treason, the only thing against him that I can see is his age.

Sanders.... He sucks the least. That's about the most I can say for the guy.
Bad points? I don't see him having a strong presence as far as foreign affairs goes.
Every major player on the world stage will try him out.
15 dollar minimum wage. That has got to be the dumbest idea those liberals have thrown out so far.
Have any idea what that would do to the economy here? What about right to work states with a lower standard of living than the unionize state? The only people that benefit from that are corporations and big business in general.
It would kill of all their small business competitors and give them all the justification they need to stop giving raises and get rid of employee benefits. No one seem to think about those nasty little factors.
Besides, just what good is have a minimum wage at 15 dollars an hour when it keeps people from hiring?
Where I live, $15 an hour is pretty good pay. You can buy a house and take international vacations on that pay scale. I know, cause I do that. Jump minimum wage up to 15, and that all goes out the window, It'll be back to living paycheck to paycheck and paying utilities based on which one has the soonest cut notice.

Gun laws. You left that one out. Gotta love those stupid liberals.... This guy wants to "end" the war on drugs the government created and replace it with the war on guns.
Illegal drugs gave rise to unregulated expansion and made goat ropers in Mexico some of the most powerful people on the planet. All the liberals really want to do is replace drugs with guns. And so will those goat ropers. The left don't think about that. Or they are stupid enough to deny that fact. Making laws against something with a strong demand won't make it go away. It just goes underground. And something like firearms? I would rather the gun nuts fill out all the paperwork at Ammunation than the alternative.
Besides, why do they want to go against the will of the people on that? Know how many guns got sold after those idiots shot up San Bernadino, California?

And taxing the rich... What they really mean is punish success. What will be the incentive to do something if all you get is hit with a big tax bill? Also, have you noticed that all of the big people in the liberal arena here are super rich? They'll be sure to make little loop holes that let's them keep their money. It's all the rising entrepreneurs that will feel the effects from that. And again less incentive to expand (meaning no new jobs created).

Sanders doesn't sound so great now, huh?

2016 - The year Americans finally work out their elections are rigged.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvfkBHGY854&ab_channel=TRUTHstreammedia

Complete MSM Blackout as Americans Protest Their Fake Presidential Election Process
Exactly how many times and in how many different ways do American voters on both sides of the aisle have to be told their votes don’t matter for them to actually realize it? This many. People are starting to realize it. That’s why the media had to blackout a mass protest at the capitol where hundreds of people were arrested for peacefully protesting our rigged elections... without a permit.

Dude... you really need to get away from these losers. Morons spinning things all sorts of ways. This "rigging" has been that way for a long time. That link? it's probably the dummest one yet. Looks like a bunch of disgruntled Sanders supporters realizing how the party machine works. And their still too stupid to figure it out. And that whiny chick's voice? How can you listen to that crap? I like how these clowns throw up screens to look like they're some sort of news network when they're really just unemployed millenials living with their parents. Remember that stupid truther movie, Zietgiest? Remember all the goofy crap those morons did?
You'd think people would learn to spin their nonsense stories a little better than that by now. Not this girl. Maybe I should post them a link to Zietgiest so they can learn what NOT to do when trying to manipulate a story.
The problem isn't our votes not counting - believe it or not they do. Just not directly. Remember, it's ultimately the electoral college that decides whose President. So if that's the case to begin with then how does making a voter's vote not count do anything?
No the problem isn't that. All that nonsense this video and others like itis one group of losers jealous of the other scumbags winning and they broadcast these catchy conspiracy videos to who? Low information voters. Look that up. Low info votes. That's the name of the game, herding them around.
The real problem is the complete lack of qualified candidates. Another are the third parties out there (libertarians and greens) aren't putting themselves forward and lack the ability to think strategically.
Another problem is flat out partisan politics. Used to be the guy that won the election became president and second place became vice-president.
Going back to that might be a good idea.

Politics in the Animal Kingdom, starting with "The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained" by CGP Grey.

Summary: First Past the Post results in a two-party system. It's mathematically proven. Even if third parties were putting themselves forward in such a way that the public felt they had any sort of viability, that only helps the candidate/party among the dominant two they like the least (i.e. the Spoiler Effect).

Quote from Forbin :

Politics in the Animal Kingdom, starting with "The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained" by CGP Grey.

Summary: First Past the Post results in a two-party system. It's mathematically proven. Even if third parties were putting themselves forward in such a way that the public felt they had any sort of viability, that only helps the candidate/party among the dominant two they like the least (i.e. the Spoiler Effect).

Yes. at first. It does that, but what with consistency? After they prove to the public as a whole to be a viable candidate with an agreeable stance? They won't be spoilers so much as a real contender if that happens.
Until now third parties were considered fringe elements that pander to a select few of the population. Well look at the two party system right now. They're really not all that in touch with the population either. If these third parties can expand their vote bases by just a little bit more and have committed voters in the parties, I think they have the potential to spoil things in both parties. The popularity of Trump and Sanders in their parties isn't a fluke. They are a reflection of a growing part of the nation sick to death of these two parties. For every moronic fool at a Trump convention, there are about fifty normal people that are just tired of what's being offered and are settling for Trump. Same with Sanders. Not everyone that likes him are the gun grabbing tree hugger types he's associated with. The thrid parties need to market themselves to these supporters. Especially the Libertarians. One of the big things Trump and Sanders both have that appeals to their supporters is their financial independence from big money lobbyists and super-pacs, Which are the meat and potatoes of the Republican and Democratic parties. Libertarians? LOL the guy in their party running for congress had to get a part-time job and a second mortgage and his youngest kid ain't going to college (I'm making that up to prove a point) They really aren't bought and paid for like the other guys which what my cousin X seems to realize but doesn't quite understand how it works.
so if Third parties get their act together, they can go from fringe to mainstream and give us a viable alternative. It would put a dent in PAC run governments and limit big money influence and influence peddling just by increasing the number of people needing to get paid to get what you want.
Another thing that Trump and Sanders supporters seem to have a lot in common is really weird seeing that both of these candidates are big government. That is that those supporters aren't so much left wing or right wing but instead want to see the wings of government clipped altogether. But I think the strangest thing of all is with all that they have in common, you put a Trump supporter in room with a Sanders supporter and you'll see two people trying to kill each other.
That all being said, I still think Trump is nothing more than a spoiler - for Hillary Clinton. He's split the Republican party up so bad they can't really unify behind anyone and through his antics makes independent voters stay away from that party in general. Our house hold is.... Spanglish. And don't vote single party. Do you know how likely we are to vote for a GOP candidate much less that Trump moron if he gets the nomination? There's enough of us population wise to insure a GOP failure in 2016 because of Trump and the hyper xenophobia their anti-immigration attitude puts out.
If the libertarians would take advantage of all this though, it would be well worth it for them. They might even have a serious Presidential candidate in '20.

Of course their financial independence is an appeal. <1% of donations for Bernie > $1k I believe. For Hilary something like 48% of her $$$ comes from big corporations. Who do you think will better have your interests?

As for Trump, I disagree on the whole deportation thing. What would be more beneficial is to allow these immigrants to get working papers legally and let them pay taxes. I agree illegally immigration is a problem, but that should be a proactive effort not a retroactive one AND our goal is not to be racist, but simply allow people of any race, creed, ethnicity, or nationality to enter the country in a legal manner and screen them all the same.

my 2c.

Quote from Bmxtwins :

Of course their financial independence is an appeal. <1% of donations for Bernie > $1k I believe. For Hilary something like 48% of her $$$ comes from big corporations. Who do you think will better have your interests?

As for Trump, I disagree on the whole deportation thing. What would be more beneficial is to allow these immigrants to get working papers legally and let them pay taxes. I agree illegally immigration is a problem, but that should be a proactive effort not a retroactive one AND our goal is not to be racist, but simply allow people of any race, creed, ethnicity, or nationality to enter the country in a legal manner and screen them all the same.

my 2c.

Hasn't Bernie raked in more money than her though? poor Bernie. He's about to be Crash and Burnie. maybe him and Ted Cruz can do commercials for Cialis after all this? Kasich? Yeah... he'll still be running for the nomination in 2017. I don't think he realizes the party's over and was over for him before it even started.
Immigration. I was a big fan of NAFTA. I realized it's potentials. Illegal immigration would from Latin America would have been virtually nonexistent. You had three big things working against it though. Cartels and "the Bite" from Mexico. Right wing Xenophobes and racists from the south US of A and Left wing pro Union labor organizations from Canada and the northern US. Then of course Bin Laden and 911 came along and made the US paranoid. And that finally killed it.
It appears to be a Trump/Clinton showdown. I still think Trump was in it to win it - for Hillary Clinton. But who knows? if that's so, then this might just be a real life example of Frankenstein.

Well. It's all but official. A Clinton Trump Showdown. Wow. That sucks.
I still think that Trump's in league with Hillary, but Who knows? If he just sticks to the same ol same ol school playground style name calling, he'll lose and I'll be convinced he was a scam all along. But if he really wants the Presidency, then he'll unleash a torrent of crap on her that could very well cast the Clintons completely out of the political picture here.
Every Presidential election, Serial Killer Charles Manson gets around 1500 votes. I think he'll get 1501 this time.

Hard to say, in any rational country Hillary would be inside the big house. But its America so who knows. Current betting suggests that Obama will pardon her of anything she has ever done. A 'Get out of Jail' card applied before she even faces a Judge.

So, here is the public domain (with references) information on Hillary and the email saga.
Part 1
Part 2

Mind you, the following list is educational........

A couple of notable points, Vince Foster, Chinagate, Whitewater, Pardongate, the whole dead person list, That alone is impressive. So many suicides where people shot themselves in the head, twice.........

And the list goes on.

Still, this is a strong responce to reality.

Hillary Clinton wants Americans to vote for her because she’s a woman and her campaign is increasingly embracing the female mantle.

A campaign email sent today offered supporters their very own “woman card” after they claimed, “We’ve been hearing from supporters all over the country that they’d like a ‘woman card’ of their very own — to display proudly on a fridge or pull out of their wallet every time they run into someone who says women who support Hillary must not be using our brains…”

The campaign asks supporters for a donation so they can get their own “woman card”. “…you’ll be able to play the woman card anytime you want,” the email reads.”

Good thing the American Media can ignore any fact and support the lady


“It’s just like the Martha Stewart situation—she went to jail not for insider trading, but for lying to the feds about her trades,” a Democrat party insider told us. “The political appointees at the D.O.J. might be inclined to give Hillary a free pass for recklessly exposing national security info and for granting favors to Clinton Foundation donors, but there is no way they could overlook her making false statements while being questioned under oath by FBI agents.”

"The thinking is, if the Clintons can convince Obama to give Hillary a preemptive pardon, along the lines of the one that President Ford gave Richard Nixon soon after replacing him in the White House, she can tell her supporters that she had to accept it because she was being victimized by a vast right-wing conspiracy. And guess what, it just might work."
http://www.orbmagazine.com/the-orbiter/hillary-clintons-backers-want-obama-to-grant-a-preemptive-pardon-to-prevent-her-from-facing-a-martha-stewart-problem/

And a Hillary photo montage

I'm at a total loss for the Hillary Clinton Phenomenon. I do know the term Ex-pat is sounding better and better.

Hillary being investigated ! - ROFL

Near the beginning of a recent interview, an FBI investigator broached a topic with longtime Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that her lawyer and the Justice Department had agreed would be off limits, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Mills and her lawyer left the room — though both returned a short time later — and prosecutors were somewhat taken aback that their FBI colleague had ventured beyond what was anticipated, the people said.

"Yes, I will help you investigate what criminal and espionage activity may have been going on, so long as you agree not to ask me about what criminal and espionage activity may have been going on!" -- Hillary-drone

Don't worry, US of A drones... Russia is considering kindly offering to provide a copy of all of your Secretary of States emails on her 'Private Server' that you are unable to recover.

China are yet to offer their copies.......

Good news for the US though....."A hacker in Florida exposed security vulnerabilities in one county’s elections web domains so officials could fix the problem — but, instead, he ended up behind bars."

Because, you can't show that the the "Emperor has no clothes".


........ Hillary Clinton has received nearly $75,000 in political contributions from employees at the Department of Justice, the agency that would decide whether or not to act if the FBI recommended charges against Clinton or her aides following its investigation into her private email server.

Justice Department employees have given Clinton far more money than her rivals, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) and Donald Trump, according to a review of federal campaign contributions for the 2016 presidential cycle.

Clinton collected $73,437 from individuals who listed the “Department of Justice” as their employer. Twelve of the 228 contributions were for $2,700, the maximum individual amount allowed by law.

The fundraising haul marks a dramatic increase over Clinton’s unsuccessful presidential run in 2008, when she took in 23 contributions totaling $15,930 from employees at the agency, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.


"The emails that the State Department yesterday told the Republican National Committee cannot be found are the ones sent and received by Clinton former aide, Bryan Pagliano—the person who set up Clinton’s private server and email apparatus who was granted immunity to testify in March, 2016.

Having been granted the immunity he sought, his emails go missing?

How convenient!

In other words, having been granted immunity, the emails sent to or received by him between 2009 and 2013-the years of Clinton’s tenure as America’s top diplomat, have gone missing.

Hello?
Lucky for Pagliano that it was his emails and not he who got ‘deleted’"
http://investmentwatchblog.com/hillarys-emails-hacked-by-russia-kremlin-deciding-whether-to-release-20000-stolen-emails/

Open Letter by Major Ed Cohet US Army intelligence officer:

“What all Americans need to know about Hillary Clintons alleged SAP compromise.”

The Severity of Clinton’s Security Breaches
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCEL1Bxp6NA&ab_channel=BillStill

Want to support Hillary?, Watch the above............

Quote from Racer X NZ :

Want to support Hillary?, Watch the movie

You know that saying about being in between a rock and a hard place? A Rolling Stones Song?
Here's a quick quiz - the4 kind that ain't on the citizenship test.

As a proud American, this presidential election, I can:
a - vote against Hillary and vote for Trump, who 'll lag behind her in November?
b - vote for a third party candidate, like a libertarian or a green and just take votes away from the only person that almost stood a chance to beat her?
c - give up and realize that she's got this hands down and that i'll have take an apologetic tone when discussing the finer points of political systems with Non Americans on the Internet?

Do you have any idea what's going to happen when she gets sworn in?

But then again, what do you expect? You go for all these arcane conspiracies... well the truth is stranger than fiction, cousin.
We have dams and highways falling apart. Why? because doing something about it isn't as glamorous as say squabbling over schools having transgendered bathrooms.
Speaking of, and this is off topic, I saw a commercial for a talk show. On it was a family that had some little freak boy that thought he was a girl. They were being applauded for getting this - I think 7 year old hormone inducing shots. Can you believe that? These parents should be locked up and sterilized. Not applauded. And yet, this is supposed to be acceptable. If that's the case, then why not go all the hell out and legalize 4th trimester abortions?
Like you have little Johnnie. He doesn't think he's a girl. In fact he doesn't think much at all. You realize little Johnnie isn't as bright as the other kids and probably won't ever be. You realize with little Johnnie, your retirement years are out the window as you'll still be supporting him and whatever bratty kids from whatever crackhead stripper he knocked up. Well. If it's OK to pump little johnnie full of hormones so he'll grow boobs and be little Joanie, then why not make it legal to take little Johnnie out the picture entirely if you think things aren't going to pan out?
You do realize how much more important of an issue this is than a couple of mis-placed emails, don't you?
At least that's the thing on America's mind right now.

You know, last week, my granddaughter was saying she was an arrow. How much trouble would I have gotten into if I dusted off the cross bow and ....

They don't give trans children hormones. They give them hormone blockers to delay puberty and allow them to choose how to proceed at an older age.

Also, your post above is incredibly ableist and transphobic,

None of that will bother Bill !!!

It doesn't help that the Democratic establishment seems to have played a role in getting Epstein a pass on child rape, that Bill Clinton already had rape accusations in his past or that the Clintons had become notorious for their willingness to do favors for criminals in exchange for money.

Either way we've come a long way from Gary Hart being bounced for "Monkey Business" to Bill Clinton flying around on a child rapist's plane without anyone in the media seeming to care much about it.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262853/why-bill-clintons-26-trips-lolita-express-child-daniel-greenfield

Newly released flight logs show former US president Bill Clinton flew on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “Lolita Express” jet at least 26 times.
Clinton reportedly ditched his Secret Service detail for at least five flights, even though there does not appear to be any of the required paperwork for signing the detail off.
Last year, it emerged that Epstein allegedly transferred $3.5 million from his secret Swiss bank account to the Clinton Foundation around the same time as the FBI began investigating him.

"At a campaign stop in Fort Mitchell, Ky., Clinton said her husband would be "in charge of revitalizing the economy.""

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that the (Clinton) foundation in 2010 committed $2 million to Energy Pioneer Solutions, despite IRS rules that say a charity is not “supposed to act in anyone’s private interests.” The ex-president even personally arranged a US Energy Department grant to the company.

Among the firm’s owners are several longtime Clinton friends — including a wealthy blond divorcée from Chappaqua whose relationship with Bill has long been the subject of speculation. The Journal reports that the foundation even removed the fiscal link from its website to avoid calling attention to Bill’s “friendship.”

So we’re back to that again.

Smirking aside, though, the Clinton Foundation has been embroiled in one financial scandal after another. Last fall, it had to amend four years of tax filings to come clean about $20 million in foreign donations it received while Hillary served as secretary of state.

Quote from Forbin :

They don't give trans children hormones. They give them hormone blockers to delay puberty and allow them to choose how to proceed at an older age.

Also, your post above is incredibly ableist and transphobic,

And you think that's OK....
So.... with that logic it's OK for me to shoot my granddaughter thru the crossbow the next time she decides she's an arrow?

Wait... I'm Jesus Christ dammit! give me money! You know I'm Jesus because I said I was! Now give me money and my own special bathroom you sinner!
Now doesn't that make a lot of sense Forbin?
Yeah, I may be transphobic (afraid of defects?) but at least I'm not a gullible herd animal.
It's probably a good thing those stupid parents didn't have a kid that thought he was a gold fish - huh?