::giggle::
I used to be a stickler for good spelling (and I used to BE a good speller, too. I did actually think it WAS "attrocious"), but these days I'm less fanatical. My nieces have beaten it out of me, by IMing me with what I'd call heavily chav'd spelling. Correct spelling, to them, is irrelevent to the communication of meaning, which is everything. AKA MSN.
When I read Harry Potter, I was horrified to find "should of".. but that's common language, today. How can I dispute it? And "shouldn't've".. it SHOULD be "shouldn't have", and yet who doesn't SAY "shouldn't've"? Double-apostrophe contractions are the future, I guess!
I used to be a stickler for good spelling (and I used to BE a good speller, too. I did actually think it WAS "attrocious"), but these days I'm less fanatical. My nieces have beaten it out of me, by IMing me with what I'd call heavily chav'd spelling. Correct spelling, to them, is irrelevent to the communication of meaning, which is everything. AKA MSN.
When I read Harry Potter, I was horrified to find "should of".. but that's common language, today. How can I dispute it? And "shouldn't've".. it SHOULD be "shouldn't have", and yet who doesn't SAY "shouldn't've"? Double-apostrophe contractions are the future, I guess!