[ EDIT : XP users please no more reports unless you find a problem - we need Vista reports now ]
OK... some of you may remember the sound test program which we used to identify the Windows Vista problem. I've changed that test program to use DirectSound instead of waveOut. It's very small, only 52 K.
Instructions are on screen but anyway, run the program and press S to start. You will then find, if you use A and Z to change the frequency, there is quite a lag in the changing of the sound. You use N and M to reduce or increase this lag (known as "Write Ahead"). Try to go as low as possible. At some point, you will go too low, and you will get sound corruption either continually, or when changing the frequency.
What we need to find out is :
- can this eliminate sound lag in Vista?
- how low can you go with "Write ahead"
- any problems with it in XP or 98?
http://www.liveforspeed.co.uk/SoundTest_DSOUND.zip
OK... some of you may remember the sound test program which we used to identify the Windows Vista problem. I've changed that test program to use DirectSound instead of waveOut. It's very small, only 52 K.
Instructions are on screen but anyway, run the program and press S to start. You will then find, if you use A and Z to change the frequency, there is quite a lag in the changing of the sound. You use N and M to reduce or increase this lag (known as "Write Ahead"). Try to go as low as possible. At some point, you will go too low, and you will get sound corruption either continually, or when changing the frequency.
What we need to find out is :
- can this eliminate sound lag in Vista?
- how low can you go with "Write ahead"
- any problems with it in XP or 98?
http://www.liveforspeed.co.uk/SoundTest_DSOUND.zip