The online racing simulator
Installed the patch not much diffrence from 70-80 FPS it drops to 15-20 at the begining.

Tried the affinity and do get just about 5-10 FPS extra which helps a lot.

I guess i just need a new graphics card. I am open to suggestions as to which card will be most suited for this PC.

Thanks in advance.
#54 - Jakg
graphics card? How much ya got?

Best bet would be something like a 6600GT (£50-£60), a 6800GT (getting a bit rare so i can't quite remember the price) or a 7600GT (bout £100)

The 6800GT will be about 1.6x faster than the 6600GT, and the 7600GT will be bit faster than the 7600GT
If you are only using one proccessor core and getting better fps than 2, shouldn't that mean that lfs is only taking advantage of one? illepall

And I didn't realize Pentium D's are dual core (according to the new system he posted as opposed to the old one). Correct me on this If I'm wrong as you guys are trying to help him utilize both of his cores.
from cheapest to most expensive (and slower to faster)
Radeon X800 GTO 256mb ~55£
Geforce 7600 GT ~90£
Radeon X1950 PRO/Geforce 7900 GS ~120£
Geforce 7900 GTO/Radeon X1900 XT ~170£

personally, i'd go with the x800. its a great card. but you won't go wrong with any of the cards that Jakg or I listed here. If you want to go cheaper than 50£, then we'll come up with some suggestions for you
yes the Pentium D is a dual core (that's what the D stands for ), and yes, LFS only utilizes 1 of the processors. And the patch won't make LFS use both cores, it just fixes a bug that causes reduced performance when only using one core, as compared to a single core cpu (if that makes any sense)
JakG/glyphon

Thank you so much for the info will shop around and let you know what i may purchase.

Once again much appreciated.
Dual Core technology:
>
> Dual Core processors have two processing cores on the chip, allowing the
> processor to handle more processing threads simultaneously.
>
> Dual Core processors do not perform twice the work of a single-core
> processor. This is due to the overhead associated with dividing the
> workload.
>
> All versions of Windows XP: Home, Professional, and Media Center
> Edition, benefit from dual-core processors. It is not necessary to have
> Windows XP Professional to support dual cores on a single chip.
>
> It does not include hyper-threading technology.
>
> With dual core technology you will be able to see only 2 grah histories
> and if hyper threading was there you will be able to see 4 graphs which
> was not present on Presasrio SR1939UK
Ok that clears it up, didn't realize that Pentium D's were dual core :\
Quote from sshhaabb :Dual Core technology:
>
> Dual Core processors have two processing cores on the chip, allowing the
> processor to handle more processing threads simultaneously.
>
> Dual Core processors do not perform twice the work of a single-core
> processor. This is due to the overhead associated with dividing the
> workload.
>
> All versions of Windows XP: Home, Professional, and Media Center
> Edition, benefit from dual-core processors. It is not necessary to have
> Windows XP Professional to support dual cores on a single chip.
>
> It does not include hyper-threading technology.
>
> With dual core technology you will be able to see only 2 grah histories
> and if hyper threading was there you will be able to see 4 graphs which
> was not present on Presasrio SR1939UK

Ah, ok, dual core processor, with both cores having HT but they disabled HT so its not using HT and only showing the two cores.

Fair enough, bit silly tho, as the HT is what gives it some of its power illepall

FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG