The original examples are correct. The sentence's subject is "Scawen" and the topic is "code", and since the code belongs to Scawen "Scawen's code..." is correct.
As I said, I do make many mistakes myself and the objective of this thread is to help other people. If you, yourself would like to do something helpful, maybe you could tell me where my mistake is.
"It's a great day" is actually correct, not incorrect. This is because "It's" is context sensitive and in this particular case is an abbreviation of "It is" (i.e. "It is a great day") instead of referring to possession.
Nope - I had it the wrong way around though so thanks for raising the issue. See my original post for sources. "It's" = "It is" or "It has" - it is context sensitive in that respect; "Its" indicates posession to an it much like "his", "hers", "ours", etc. However, you'll rarely (rearly)see "its" being used seeing (seing) as few things belong to an object and even if they do, you don't need to refer to them in that way. However, an example would be: The plane crashed because its wings fell off.
There was a story some time ago about a US guy visiting London, UK some years ago. A guy walks up to him and a says;
"Hey, bum a fag, mate?"
[= can i borrow a cigarette?]
The tourist ran a mile.
I before E except after C. Except for neighbour and weight, unless it's just weird. Damn odd rule, which isn't really a rule as it has so many exceptions to it.
That has always bothered me, such as people who you have no idea who they are ask if they can loan X ammount of money to do what ever, it isn't like you're going to ever see them again so it's not really a loan, it is more a case of "can I have X ammount of money", though asking for money is illegal in the UK (maybe the same for other countries), but loaning isn't, so I guess it's the whole loop hole deal.
Just wondering, which is more correct, "licensed" or "licenced"?
It always thought "licensed" is correct, but I often see "licenced" as well (for instance on the STCC sigs).