No, because then it would cause a big mess amongst the people that have been here since the beginning. Why would they have to pay more than the new members in the end? I can imagine already all the threads popping up and whining.
On the other hand, we have had and used a fine product for many years, so you could say that paying more is normal. With this you enter a logic that S1 was a game in itself, S2 the second of the series etc...Like a Gtr, Gtr2 for example. Which to be honest I'm fine with.
But it would invalidate the enormous excuse that has been used over and over again, that ''Lfs isn't finished yet''. So the whole product could only have ONE price for everyone, and this price was chosen by the devs from the beginning. 36 pounds it is.
And no, as I said earlier in the thread, 36 pounds doesn't sound expensive to me. It even sounds cheap. Especially for a product that has been so refined and ''beta tested'' for so many years.
I'm sure you'll appreciate the price much more when iRacing hits the shelves! I'm sitting here hoping that I won't like it, so I don't have to waste money every month (that is if it's indeed on a pay-by-month basis).
By all means now i have played the game i dont think its expensive, but some people cant even afford the £24, most people that buy S3 will have already bought S2, but we'll have to see....
i played lfs for one year (more or less) and i think that LFS it would have to be more expensive, becose is the better car simulator. but the concept would be lost. And so much people dont have so much money, like me if it i had money, i would pay it, but i wouldn't
hahaha lol alfa ---> beta but not S3 funny i hope it will be S3 hehehe
Sorry, your right. But sometimes I´m still pissed if it comes to the oval discussion. Specially from people who are not even able to drive oval OR circuit.
Excuse me but I now hate oval because I played it too much, I agree the first year in my lfs time I mainly played oval , so dont tell me I never/can play oval.