I'm simply the first emu to race lfs

Hooray for dragging an off topic thread off topic

Quote from tristancliffe :

Thats a very cute, errr, ball of fluff (is it a Guinea Pig, or just fluff with eyes?) Android! Maybe you should put the pic in the post, cos your post will look silly when you change your avatar.

It's my hampster

Tristencliffe really isn't that much of a spammer.

Quote from Tristencliffe's profile :

Join Date: 19th September 2003
Total Posts: 1,503 (1.87 posts per day)

Quote from My profile :

Join Date: 22nd October 2005
Total Posts: 256 (6.55 posts per day)

Two posts a day isn't really all that bad. If I have been here as long as he has (lets say two years to make it easy for me), I'd have 4781.5 posts. I should disable my interweb for a few weeks, so I can get some work done. Right now I have a 3,000 word report due tomorrow. I have 1,400 words but rather then working on it, I'm posting on forums.

Quote from P5YcHoM4N :

Two posts a day isn't really all that bad.

These forums went online on, ermmm, I think it was August 10th 2005. The join date is the date of the 'license name' being taken on the main site. Sooooo, that'd be 112 days now which means Tristan has posted over 13 posts per day on average. :spam:

Each morning click on "New Posts". I often see over 40 threads with new posts. There may be between 1 and 100 posts in each thread. I try to read most of them in the threads that bear any significance for me - say half. I probably reply to maybe 1/3 of each of those threads. So, read 20, reply to 6.

Now do this at lunchtime, and in the evening, and if the rate of posting was the same (i.e. 40 new posts each time) that would be 18 posts per day (roughly).Of course, it never happens like that, and some days I don't most more than 2 or 3, others a lot more (if something exciting happens, or people ask me direct questions (or call me a spammer in a rude way ).

And, if you read most of my posts in context, they generally contribute to the thread. One example where my post was misinterpreted was in Scawens patch Q thread (I got told off), and the other was in a thread about damage. I told someone not to crash to turn off damage. But that's life - I was in a bit of a stress at the time. You can't say don't, cos even Victor has snapped whilst stressed/sleepy.

And to compare myself to my housemates (on the Crystal Palace fan forum) they have over 4000 posts in under 18 months, so there are plenty worse than me! Just not here

<- me and my favourite job

oh tristan, I'd say most of your posts are somehow on topic, but contribution means to be constructive *scnr*

Pff, everyone who has less than 1/10 of tristans posts is unworthy of talking to him. Soooo, Vykos, seems like you have been beaten by 0.2 posts

Was writing something here, but decided not to. So you'll have to make do with this:

:balloons: :bounce8: :bluegrab: :bath: :bannana_g :juggle: :banana: :banana: :huepfenic :something




Edit:

Quote from AndroidXP :

Pff, everyone who has less than 1/10 of tristans posts is unworthy of talking to him.

I'm not sure what you're referring to, but I never said that.

Yes, you never said that... but it's an unwritten rule for the resident forum spammer.

Quote from tristancliffe :

.....Meaningless Tristian Spam.....

I actually think Tristian makes more meaningful posts than the vast majority of members here, he just makes a lot of them If you want to see spam, go to the Di.fm forums LOL, people with 20,000+ posts, posting 5 times in one thread saying "choooooooooooooooooooooon!!!!" LOL

What does "choo..on" mean anyways?

Quote from AndroidXP :

What does "choo..on" mean anyways?

1337 speak/geek speak for tune. Music Instead of listening to a new song you listen to a new choon/ch00n.


~*~*~*~tinyk~*~*~*~

Quote from Bob Smith :

More people should start using their face, if only because I can try and blag it that I started the whole craze 6 months down the line.

I'd quite like the opposite, ban all the guys who have their face in their avatar (especially the ones who post a lot and have their head tilted )

Girls are free to show their pictures though (I know tiny won't :shrug

Quote from Huru-aito :

I'd quite like the opposite, ban all the guys who have their face in their avatar (especially the ones who post a lot and have their head tilted )

Girls are free to show their pictures though (I know tiny won't :shrug

Sometimes I feel victimised :guilty:
:Kick_Can_

Quote from tinyk :

Quote from AndroidXP :

What does "choo..on" mean anyways?

1337 speak/geek speak for tune. Music Instead of listening to a new song you listen to a new choon/ch00n.


~*~*~*~tinyk~*~*~*~

http://www.fuzzyco.com/news/archives/mime/choo.gif

Yeah heh

Quote from Huru-aito :

Girls are free to show their pictures though (I know tiny won't :shrug

Believe me, I've tried almost everything :static: laff

Quote from tristancliffe :

Sometimes I feel victimised :guilty:
:Kick_Can_

Quote from Huru-aito :

I'd quite like the opposite, ban all the guys who have their face in their avatar (especially the ones who post a lot and have their head tilted )

I'd happily change it to a photo of my arse but then I suspect you'd have more complaints.
I'd probably struggle to get someone to take the photo too...

Perhaps we can settle on the picture of the fine woman's bum I used to use:

Quote from Bob Smith :

I'd happily change it to a photo of my arse but then I suspect you'd have more complaints.
I'd probably struggle to get someone to take the photo too...

Perhaps we can settle on the picture of the fine woman's bum I used to use:

er, you do mean you use to use as an avatar, not just plain old use to use. If you just use to use it, then I would have continued using that one .

No Bob, I preferred your Floating Widget (not in a perverted way) avatar